Hobby Operating Systems

This OS news poll only lists a handful, and doesn't bother to provide any helpful links, so I have done that below.

With the possible exception of OpenBeOS and Syllable/Atheos, there's nothing there that is particularly "different". Where are the real radical ideas, like a pure virtual memory OS that only uses disks as backing store or perhaps a "network os" where everything is packet based? Oh, well: maybe one of these will ring your chimes:

Plan 9

http://plan9.bell-labs.com/plan9

Bell Labs continues to dabble in a different Unix.

Minix

http://www.minix3.org

This is the famous OS that wasn't what Linux Torvalds wanted. It's author is the guy who carped about Linux and wrote the famous Operating Systems Design and Implementation books (I have an early copy around here somewhere).

OpenBeOS

Update: OpenBeos seems to be gone, but Haiku has picked up the flag.

http://www.openbeos.org/

This is an attempt to keep the BeOS alive as a desktop OS . BeOS once was desktop oriented, but closed down and sold everything to Palm. The distinguishing aspect of Be and OpenBeOS is their object focus. The whole OS interface is object based, which means you would program for it in C++ or some other object oriented language. See http://www.beatjapan.org/mirror/www.be.com/developers/developer_library/tutorials/approachingBe.html for more.

MenuetOS

http://www.menuetos.org/

Pure assembly language (x86) all the way. Fits on a single floppy, yet boots as a GUI. Strongly focused on squeezing ultimate performance out of x86 hardware.

KolibriOS

http://www.kolibrios.org

Another pure assembly language OS.

Syllable

http://syllable.sourceforge.net/

Syllable is a fork of Atheos. Both are "semi POSIX"; that is, they don't intend POSIX compliance but do borrow strongly. The distinguishing feature here seems to be the non-X GUI and a file system that is reminiscent of Mac resource forks, but extended to multiple forks.

TriangleOS

http://members.chello.nl/~w.cools/

This is one-man effort, and the source code is not available. It is surprisingly complete considering that, though there are of course major omissions still. I can't find anything you'd call unusual here: it's another OS.

ReactOS

http://www.reactos.com/

This is a brash attempt to make an NT compatible Open Source operating system. As might be imagined, it's rather incomplete.

SkyOS

http://www.skyos.org/

This is "mainly (99.9%) a one man project" according to the web page and looks to be more complete than Triangle. Again though, it's Just Another OS as far as I can tell.

FreeDOS

http://www.freedos.org/

The goal here is a free, 100% MSDOS compatible OS. Some people may wonder why, but in fact there is still a large amount of MSDOS code kicking about, some of it doing fairly important tasks, and porting it to other systems can be hard. As the day is fast approaching where you won't be able to buy real MSDOS at all, this could become very necessary.

DROPS

http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/drops/overview.html

The Dresden Real-Time Operating System Project uses L4Linux to run ordinary time-sharing applications alongside the real-time tasks.

AROS

http://www.aros.org/

This is for the Amiga lovers. For those who have never experienced the fervor of a true Amigo explaining why nothing since has even come close to what Amiga was, well, it's something everyone should experience at least once. Some of their rantings actually have a base in reality, so don't discount this out of hand.

Aranym

http://aranym.sourceforge.net is for 32-bit Atari ST/TT/Falcon operating systems.

Visopsys

http://www.visopsys.org

Another one person project.

Others

I'm happy to add more if you'd like to point me at something you found interesting. ~

Updates:

• 10 operating systems you've never heard of
• A list of academic, personal, and small non-commercial operating systems
• New life for dead software

4 comments

More Articles by Tony Lawrence - Find me on Google+

Click here to add your comments
A lot of Commodore 64's are still in use (several million, if you can believe one estimate). I guess that machine's OS could qualify for the list, eh?

--BigDumbDinosaur

Forth
Although it once held a bigger place in the world than it does today, I think Forth could be considered a Hobby Operating System. It was certainly my hobby (and livelyhood) for a long time.

-- Tom Zimmer (author of VicForth, 64Forth, ColorForth, F-PC, Win32Forth and others)

Got a web page to point at?

--TonyLawrence

The OS Projects page got literally dozens (if not hundreds) of these small OSes. Some of which quite interesting, but most just a stundents 100th try to create an OS.

http://www.osdev.org/cgi-bin/projects.cgi

Enjoy!

-- Michaela. [http://www.mausehaus.org?doc=ela]







Tue Mar 22 20:09:33 2005: 223   anonymous


http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=10065 lists some other alternative OSes.






Tue Apr 11 20:35:29 2006: 1890   anonymous


while i am no longer doing Forth, I still have a home page, and it is located at; http://tomzimmer.blogspot.com in case anyone is interested,

Tom Zimmer
Author of zforth, FF, F-PC, Win32Forth, TCOM, ColorForth (for Radioshack Color Computer), VIC-FORTH (for Commodore VIC20), 64FORTH (for Commodore64)



Fri Dec 25 17:44:00 2009: 7825   TonyLawrence




So.. will ChromeOS be a "hobby" OS or carve a real space for itself?



Fri Dec 3 23:08:42 2010: 9146   anonymous




what about http://genode.org/. most interesting is http://genode.org/download/live-cds

Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email

Click here to add your comments

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar

Jump to Comments

Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.

Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.

We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.