APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

Spatial interface

© June 2004 Tony Lawrence

This is an interface that leaves open views open. If applied to a web browser, it would mean that every link you clicked on would get a new window. Most folks wouldn't like that, but the designers of some file system interfaces, notable Gnome, insist that is how file system navigation should work. This has created some controversy, because at least so far, Gnome provides no way to adjust this behavior to replace the current window with what you are drilling into.

In the article that the link above refers to, it is argued (Radoslaw Sokol, Opinion: Why Users Blame the Spatial Nautilius):

So, people in fact love when the machine works in a way
resembling behaviour of real-life objects, but it seems
that only when the "spatial" application is a web browser:
they accept the book metaphor with web pages, but reject
the drawer metaphor with folders and files. Sometimes
they even abuse the physical metaphor of tabbed browsing
by opening multiple pages - not subpages of the same web
site! - in multiple tabs of a browser window. I even know
few people who never open more than one browser window,
viewing all pages in tabs; I hope they do not try to glue
a daily set of newspapers together before reading them...

But interface metaphors are just metaphors. Sometimes they work well, sometimes they don't. Obviously sometimes people like to open multiple browser windows - that's whay good browser interfaces let them! A good file system interface would let you choose how you want to see your files.

Got something to add? Send me email.

(OLDER)    <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

-> spatial interface

1 comment

Inexpensive and informative Apple related e-books:

Take Control of iCloud, Fifth Edition

Take Control of IOS 11

Take Control of Pages

iOS 8: A Take Control Crash Course

Take Control of Preview

More Articles by © Tony Lawrence

Personally I use Gnome 2.6. I never liked the "file browser" metaphore, it always seemed akward and slow. The MS exploding tree thing seemed doubly useless.

I fired up 2.6 and it took 5-10 minutes seconds to orginize my folders and I never looked back. Now I know were to go to find stuff, and before I hated wasting my RAM on a bloated filing system. Never enjoyed using Gnome and used stuff like Fluxbox before that.

I'd always end up scanning each and every folder/icon caption in a screen, scrolling up and down, and back and forth. Waste of effort and time (and my eyes).

Here's the article that partially inspired the whole Gnome spatial movement thing. https://arstechnica.com/paedia/f/finder/finder-1.html



Printer Friendly Version

Have you tried Searching this site?

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us

Printer Friendly Version

Security is mostly a superstition. It does not exist in nature, nor do the children of men as a whole experience it. Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. Life is either a daring adventure, or nothing. (Helen Keller)

Linux posts

Troubleshooting posts

This post tagged:




Unix/Linux Consultants

Skills Tests

Unix/Linux Book Reviews

My Unix/Linux Troubleshooting Book

This site runs on Linode