2004/06/15 POTS
I've removed advertising from most of this site and will eventually clean up the few pages where it remains.
While not terribly expensive to maintain, this does cost me something. If I don't get enough donations to cover that expense, I will be shutting the site down in early 2020.
If you found something useful today, please consider a small donation.
Some material is very old and may be incorrect today
© June 2004 Tony Lawrence
Plain Old Telephone Service. This acronym has been in use for quite a while, almost before there really was much else other than plain old telephone service. POTS is circuit based, and of course the newer concept is packets.
Soon enough, POTS will disappear from most of the world, and just about every phone system will be packet based. What happens to the VOIP acronym then?
If you found something useful today, please consider a small donation.
Got something to add? Send me email.
Inexpensive and informative Apple related e-books:
Photos: A Take Control Crash Course
Take Control of the Mac Command Line with Terminal, Second Edition
Take control of Apple TV, Second Edition
Take Control of OS X Server
Take Control of Pages
More Articles by Tony Lawrence © 2011-07-04 Tony Lawrence
After establishing competence and ability, your customer wants to know that you are honest and that you care about their needs. Sell that, because that's what they really want to buy. (Tony Lawrence)
This post tagged:
Skills Tests
Unix/Linux Book Reviews
My Unix/Linux Troubleshooting Book
This site runs on Linode
"What happens to the VOIP acronym then?"
Simple: it becomes PSTS (packet switched telephone service), which could be pronounced as "pissed." <Smile>
Incidentally, the use of packets to transport telephone conversations is hardly new. The concept was originally devised in the 1950's to increase the number of simultaneous conversations that could be carried on undersea phone cables. The theory was that a substantial amount of the time that a phone circuit was connected was "wasted," in that no one was actually talking. It dawned on someone that multiple conversations could be carried on a single circuit simply by giving each conversation some fraction of the real time connection -- timeslicing, as it were. To do that, bursts of speech from one converstion were transmitted, then bursts from another, and so forth. On average, the callers had no idea that they only had use of the circuit for part of the time.
--BigDumbDinosaur
------------------------
Printer Friendly Version
POTS Copyright © June 2004 Tony Lawrence
Have you tried Searching this site?
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.
Contact us
Printer Friendly Version