# # SCO Unix and OpenServer 6
APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

SCO and OpenServer 6

I've removed advertising from most of this site and will eventually clean up the few pages where it remains.

While not terribly expensive to maintain, this does cost me something. If I don't get enough donations to cover that expense, I will be shutting the site down in early 2020.

If you found something useful today, please consider a small donation.



Some material is very old and may be incorrect today

© August 2005 Tony Lawrence
August 2005

At http://www.darlmcbride.com/, SCO's CEO explains why he thinks OpenServer 6 is better than Linux.

He makes some valid points, but misses the big picture. He should know better himself: if technical superiority meant anything in the real world, then Unixware would have been SCO's best selling product. Of course it wasn't, and was always a mighty small wedge of pie on SCO's own sales charts.

Darl says that OpenServer actually costs less than Linux. He bases that on the support model pricing of companies like RedHat. Sure, that's true: if you buy support for Linux, you pay for it every year, and that's much more than the simple base price of SCO's product.. but Darl conveniently forgets that plunking down the $1,399.00 or so for OpenServer 6 entitles you to nothing but the media and a license key. You get no support from SCO, and even have to pay extra for some updates that might be included in (for example) RedHat's support fees. There are also legions of folks capable of supporting themselves with Linux: they truly do pay nothing. So there is truth to what Darl asserts, but it's not as simple as he tries to make it.

If I were Darl, I'd go the RedHat route. Give the product away, while at the same time making it just a little difficult to obtain totally free, and sell yearly support at different levels. It doesn't even have to be open source; few customers really care about that. This strategy would put SCO head to head with RedHat et al. and the rest of his arguments might have some traction with some customers. Existing customers who are now phasing out SCO just might stick around if that were the sales model for Openserver 6.


If you found something useful today, please consider a small donation.



Got something to add? Send me email.





(OLDER)    <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

->
-> SCO Unix and OpenServer 6

2 comments


Inexpensive and informative Apple related e-books:

Take Control of iCloud, Fifth Edition

Take control of Apple TV, Second Edition

Take Control of OS X Server

Take Control of Automating Your Mac

Digital Sharing Crash Course





More Articles by © Tony Lawrence







Wed Aug 17 13:50:43 2005: 983   BigDumbDinosaur


If I were Darl, I'd go the RedHat route. Give the product away...


Fat chance of that happening. SCO has pissed away so much money with their "Linux stole our code" lawsuits they need to suck in every penny they can get. McBride and company are a microcosmic version of Gates and company, except OSR6 is better software.



Thu Aug 18 02:54:18 2005: 984   drag



Yep..

They do the pricing comparisions the same way Microsoft does.. Conventiently ignoring the fact that your service contract with Redhat is what your paying for vs with Microsoft you have to pay for the media then any service beyond one phone call costs extra.

------------------------


Printer Friendly Version

Have you tried Searching this site?

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us


Printer Friendly Version





Technology is both a tool for helping humans and for destroying them. This is the paradox of our times which we're compelled to face. (Frank Herbert)




Linux posts

Troubleshooting posts


This post tagged:

Opinion

SCO_OSR5



Unix/Linux Consultants

Skills Tests

Unix/Linux Book Reviews

My Unix/Linux Troubleshooting Book

This site runs on Linode