# # Old SCO Unix box gasps but recovers
APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

Accidental lockout

I've removed advertising from most of this site and will eventually clean up the few pages where it remains.

While not terribly expensive to maintain, this does cost me something. If I don't get enough donations to cover that expense, I will be shutting the site down in early 2020.

If you found something useful today, please consider a small donation.

Some material is very old and may be incorrect today

© March 2008 Anthony Lawrence

I'm beginning to really hate the old SCO systems that are left out there. However, when they call with a problem, I have to help, right? Well of course I do. But I can't help cringing sometimes..

This call was from a Boston client who honestly is trying to get off this creaking old boat. They can't seem to find off the shelf software that will meet their needs, but they have hired some company to write them a new app. Unfortunately it will be Windows, but that is what it is, right? Anyway, while the app development proceeds, the old SCO has to keep running. Early on a Friday morning, it stopped.

Well, not exactly. It stopped letting people log in. People who were already logged in could work, but recieved a message described to me as "something like 'system database not allocated'"

Well, OK - normally I'd complain and say "Please give me the EXACT message you saw", but for this I knew it had to be something in the TCB (Trusted Computing Base) being messed up. SCO has built in tools to examine and even fix up minor problems, so I felt I might be able to lead someone through fixing it, but on the other hand this stuff can sometimes get nasty so I wasn't sure. I had another problem too: I had to be somewhere else in fifteen minutes and I wouldn't be able to talk anyone through anything until I was done with that.

"How many people are still logged in?", I asked.


Well, heck, that's not so bad. It's Friday, a slow day for them as it is for most businesses, and they only usually have about twelve or so people working on that system anyway. I asked if they could limp along for a few hours. Yes, they could.. but please hurry.

So I went off to my meeting, but couldn't help thinking about how I'd approach this problem. Most likely, I could just have them run "integrity" to get a list of damaged files and restore them from backup. Most likely..

That's assuming the backup is good, of course. What if the backup has messed up files or the problem is really somewhere else? I can look at a tcb file and know what I'm looking at, but it would just be gobbledy-gook to the person at their end, so I'd have to get them to print things and fax them to me.. yuck. I shortly convinced myself that it was better to go in to the job.

After finishing up my other business, I called and explained that. I said that I probably could fix this over the phone, but I was a little hesitant because it could get nasty, and I'd rather just come in. The people at the other end immediately agreed: they really didn't want to be led through anything anyway. By the way: they were now down to two people working because the other two had "accidentally" logged out.. no, I don't know how you "accidentally" log out either.

An hour later I was there. I ran "integrity: and it pointed to /etc/auth/system/default as the problem. I looked at it and found it zero length.. how could that happen? That file should look something like this:

	:u_pickpw:u_genpwd:[email protected]:u_nullpw:\
	:u_singleuserpswd:u_secclass=c2:[email protected]:[email protected]:\

I've never seen a system glitch just zero that, so I was suspicious.

"Who's got root?"

It was a short list.

"I think somebody mean to clear something else and somehow cleared this.. or.."

The "or" would be file system corruption. Possible, but no other indicationss of that. Nothing in "syslog" or "messages" indicating any other problems. I restored the file from backup and people immdeiately could log in. I watched log files for any other problem and ran "integrity" again. No problems..

I hung out a while checking this and that.. nothing seemed odd, so I really think someone had to have done this by mistake.. I have no idea what they thought they were doing.. it couldn't have been sabotage because it was too limited.. surely anyone wanting to cause damage would have done more.. well, I would think so anyway.

So that's where I left it. I'll check in on it a few times over the next week, but I really don't think there is anything wrong.. just an "accident".

If you found something useful today, please consider a small donation.

Got something to add? Send me email.

(OLDER)    <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

-> Old SCO Unix box gasps but recovers

Inexpensive and informative Apple related e-books:

Take Control of OS X Server

Take control of Apple TV, Second Edition

Digital Sharing Crash Course

Take Control of Numbers

Take Control of Automating Your Mac

More Articles by © Anthony Lawrence

Printer Friendly Version

Have you tried Searching this site?

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us

Printer Friendly Version

If you lie to the computer, it will get you. (Perry Farrar)

Linux posts

Troubleshooting posts

This post tagged:



Unix/Linux Consultants

Skills Tests

Unix/Linux Book Reviews

My Unix/Linux Troubleshooting Book

This site runs on Linode