APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

Electronic Fraud


© November 2006 Anthony Lawrence
2006/11/08

Lunatic liberal that I am, I'm certainly not unhappy about yesterday's election results. I've been voting anti-Republican ever since they embraced the Religious Right and will continue to do so until these s.o.b's understand that Americans don't want to be dominated by right wing Christian extremism. Moderates like John McCain would tempt me should he run for President, and the few strange Democrats like Joe Lieberman disgust me, but until the GOP shakes those religious nuts out of its pockets, I'll vote a straight Democratic ticket whenever I can.

Of course I'd like to think that my anti-Republican vote gets recorded properly. Apparently at a few places around the country that wasn't always the case. Now we all understand that there will always be some level of fraud or attempts in that direction: aside from the normal greed and corruption we always have, many people have extremely strong feelings on certain issues and feel that electing the "wrong" candidate is so dangerous that they are willing to cast aside honesty to prevent such a "mistake". There are probably people on both sides who would accept "the ends justify the means" arguments, but I can't help feeling that the Religious Right provides more fertile ground for such activity..

Regardless, the sane majority probably agrees that votes should be counted honestly, always. We just hope that the electorate has enough community intelligence to avoid the really dangerous candidates most of the time. Some might say that's a lot of hope riding on a pretty weak horse, but so far it's either worked out or we've been damn lucky. Or maybe a little of both.

As we move more toward electronic voting machines, I am more concerned about fraud. On the one hand, it should be easier to build in more cross-checks and safeguards against fraud. But on the other side, if the software is compromised, it could be much harder to spot the problem and would definitely be so for "ordinary" folk: you need security experts to understand what happened and how.

Some say that whatreallyhappened.com/biggerthanwatergate.html (link dead, sorry) compromises have already occurred. Maybe that's tin-foil hat territory, but everyone agrees that this could happen rather easily. That leaves me feeling rather queasy.. how about you?


Got something to add? Send me email.





(OLDER)    <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

->
-> Electronic Voting Fraud


Inexpensive and informative Apple related e-books:

Take Control of the Mac Command Line with Terminal, Second Edition

Digital Sharing Crash Course

iOS 8: A Take Control Crash Course

Take Control of Automating Your Mac

Take Control of Apple Mail, Third Edition




More Articles by © Anthony Lawrence




Printer Friendly Version

Have you tried Searching this site?

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us


Printer Friendly Version





Unlike info, pinfo does not display anything if it has nothing. I've been forever irritated by info coming up with its default page when it has nothing to tell me. (Tony Lawrence)




Linux posts

Troubleshooting posts


This post tagged:

Opinion



Unix/Linux Consultants

Skills Tests

Unix/Linux Book Reviews

My Unix/Linux Troubleshooting Book

This site runs on Linode