Could technology have saved Cecil?

I have read several articles which defend Walter Palmer and others like him on the grounds that the money they pay allows other animals to live and that sometimes old sterile lions prevent younger lions from mating. Really, these hunters should be applauded as conservationists, they assert.

Personally I would say that a true conservationist would pay just for a picture of the animal his donation is supporting and that if animals do need to be put down, it should be done humanely - I assume the trophy heads will bring good money still.

But that would only work in a world where humans have morals, so let's accept the carnage as necessary.

Why couldn't animals that are to be killed be tagged with a low power beacon that identifies the specific animal as one which may be taken by someone with the proper license? Yes, there would be extra cost, but that can surely be borne by those willing to pay tens of thousands of dollars to hide in a blind and have the animal baited or driven to them.

Got something to add? Send me email.

(OLDER) <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

-> -> Could technology have saved Cecil?

Increase ad revenue 50-250% with Ezoic

More Articles by

Find me on Google+

© Anthony Lawrence

Kerio Samepage

Have you tried Searching this site?

Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us

Additional Info