# # The cost of Linux
APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

The cost of Linux

I've removed advertising from most of this site and will eventually clean up the few pages where it remains.

While not terribly expensive to maintain, this does cost me something. If I don't get enough donations to cover that expense, I will be shutting the site down in early 2020.

If you found something useful today, please consider a small donation.



Some material is very old and may be incorrect today

© October 2005 Tony Lawrence

Matt Asay's AC/OS blog says that one of the "expenses" noted in Microsoft TCO studies is the cost of training. He says:


 If you read Microsoft's TCO case studies, its customers only state
 that Microsoft is cheaper because they didn't want to invest in
 any new training, which is a bit of a canard since Unix skills
 transfer automatically to Linux skills and, last time I checked,
 Unix predates Windows (so, in many cases, it is Unix skill, not
 Windows skill, that needs transferring....); 
 

While that might be true in some places, we all know that there are plenty of Windows folk who know nothing at all about anything but Windows, so I'm not sure that offers much against Microsoft's position. However, he also notices the thing all us Unix folk know to be true:

Linux requires fewer support resources.
 

There's another side to that. Every Unix run business that switched to Windows will tell the same story: they immediately had far more support problems and needed far more people to handle the needs.

Every customer I have that even just switched away from dumb terminals to PC's but left the Unix servers in place still has the same complaints: every day, something goes wrong somewhere. Most of them end up having to hire in-house support people they never needed before drinking the Gates brew. Where they formerly could rely entirely upon occasional help from outside people like me, now they need one or more inside people working every day. It's disgusting, but at least those people know what they lost: there are many more who never did anything but Windows, so for them, the extraordinary support needs seem natural.


Matt says Linux is taking a bite of Windows turf. May Linux (and Mac and even SCO if they can survive) gnaw the legs right off the beast.


If you found something useful today, please consider a small donation.



Got something to add? Send me email.





(OLDER)    <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

->
-> The cost of Linux

1 comment


Inexpensive and informative Apple related e-books:

Take Control of High Sierra

Take Control of IOS 11

Photos: A Take Control Crash Course

Take control of Apple TV, Second Edition

Photos for Mac: A Take Control Crash Course





More Articles by © Tony Lawrence







Tue Oct 11 09:49:10 2005: 1183   drag


Yep. 2 legs.

One is Office.
The other is Windows.

Get rid of one and the company crashes.

------------------------


Printer Friendly Version

Have you tried Searching this site?

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us


Printer Friendly Version





Actually I made up the term "object-oriented", and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind. (Alan Kay)




Linux posts

Troubleshooting posts


This post tagged:

Linux

Unix



Unix/Linux Consultants

Skills Tests

Unix/Linux Book Reviews

My Unix/Linux Troubleshooting Book

This site runs on Linode