APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

Chrome OS on Vmware Fusion

© November 2009 Anthony Lawrence

I downloaded a Chrome OS disk image from Linux Magazine in Germany, but there are quicker downloads available.

I installed this in VMWare Fusion, but it also works with Virtual Box and surely with Windows or Linux VmWare. Remember that what you have is a disk image - not a VMware appliance.

The only problem I had was networking - it apparently needs to be bridged, not NAT. Once I changed that and rebooted, everything worked. It takes less than 15 seconds on my Mac to get to login. That's not half bad for a VMware machine.

The login is "chrome@gmail.com" and the password is "chrome" if you don't already have a Google account. That's all you need to get started.

If you've read about Chrome OS, you know that it's basically Linux in a kiosk mode. The only apparent application available to you is the browser. However, that's not really true: a "Ctrl-Alt-T" will open up a terminal window. One there, you'll find that you are really logged in as "chronos" and that you can use "sudo" for anything you need to do as root. (password for "chronos" is "chrome") Of course you can ssh anywhere you like - a browser and ssh takes care of just about everything I need on a daily basis, so I can definitely see using this on a Netbook.

terminal in ChromeOS

I did have one minor obstacle: my website (one of my primary ssh destinations) is protected by ssh keys. That's simple to solve: I just scp'd my .ssh directory from my real computer and then did "ssh -i .ssh/id_dsa.pub ...". That takes care of that.

You may have also read that Chrome OS has root as readonly. That's true. However, nothing stops you from doing "mount -o remount,rw /". After that, you can hack away all you want and nothing will be lost when you reboot.

I did have some issues in the Terminal - repeating keys, odd characters showing up, lockups... expected in something so early.

So - the race is on. Apple is expected to put out its tablet PC next year and next year is Google's projected date for Chrome OS. There are even rumors that Microsoft will enter the fray with its own free OS (bet on them screwing it up if they do!).

Who will win? I'd guess almost certainly not Microsoft. They just can't help themselves: they will always pee in the beer before serving it. Their security track record hasn't been polished up by Vista or Win 7 either and they NEED the money from OS sales. Google gets money from advertising, gmail and other sources, Apple gets it from hardware - Microsoft makes its dough from selling software. Already more and more companies are switching to Open Office and this sort of appliance will just hasten that - I don't see that Microsoft can afford to give away an operating system.

Though Microsoft is hoping to steal search from Google with Bing. Their latest move on that front is to make a deal with Rupert Murdoch where they pay him to allow Bing to index his vast news empire while locking Google out. They think this will freeze out Google, but it will not, for numerous reasons - one of the more obvious being that Google will have indexed someone blogging about the news they read at a Murdoch site within minutes while Microsoft is likely not to even know about the post for half an hour or more - Bing just doesn't have the horsepower and may never have it.

If Google gets out in front of Apple, Apple's salvation could be apps. If their Tablet runs iPhone apps, I don't think Google can easily compete - Google plainly doesn't have the in-house talent for slick apps and they haven't yet developed any real relationship with developers. Of course the corrolary is that Apple iPhone developers are somewhat unhappy and rebellious, so that does leave an opening - but Apple's strong control is what keeps the user experience stable, so letting developers run free is not necessarily without peril.

One thing for sure: the second decade of this century is going to be interesting!

See also Fear and Loathing of Chrome OS?

Got something to add? Send me email.

(OLDER)    <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

-> Chrome OS on Vmware Fusion


Inexpensive and informative Apple related e-books:

Take Control of High Sierra

Take control of Apple TV, Second Edition

Sierra: A Take Control Crash Course

Take Control of Preview

Take Control of IOS 11

More Articles by © Anthony Lawrence

Tue Nov 24 21:20:38 2009: 7612   TonyLawrence

Will Google give away the netbook too? (link)

Wed Nov 25 15:46:40 2009: 7624   TonyLawrence

I started a public wave about fear and loathing of Chrome OS et al. : (link)
If you do not have a Wave id yet, I still have invites left!

Thu Nov 26 12:24:41 2009: 7629   TonyLawrence

Here's someone who really doesn't get it: (link dead, sorry)
He mistakenly thinks Chrome is no threat to Microsoft.

Fri Nov 27 17:41:44 2009: 7670   anonymous

Anything but Microsoft, right? So, people are going to pay almost the same amount of money for a machine that does significantly less and relies on the cloud? (Rasoning that XP adds roughly $15 to the price of a netbook; I can't imagine Win7 Starter being much more considering the Starter -> Home Premium upgrade pack costs around $70 retail.) This is just like current Desktop Linux: it won't go anywhere as long as switching is less than a lateral move.

I think they would have been better off coming out with a more netbook-oriented edition of Android. There's no reason you can't go to docs.google.com on Android (or any other OS for that matter, as long as it has a halfway new web browser). At least then you won't have to rely on the cloud, generally feature-spartan Web apps, and having a reliable Internet connection." Plus, being able to write an application once and have the same binaries work on both your netbook and smartphone would have given them some leverage. But no, instead they come up with a less-functional-than-a-smartphone OS to run on not-quite-smartphone-not-quite-laptop devices. The whole appeal of a netbook is that it runs everything your laptop can, but on a smaller package. Why throw that out the window so you can only run a browser full screen? (Hint: I can do that too with my XP installation: open Firefox/IE/Chrome/Opera/Whatever and press F11.)

Fri Nov 27 18:10:25 2009: 7671   TonyLawrence

I'll be talking more about this in a future post, but no, it's not "anything but Microsoft".

For people like Dell, $15 per unit is a big deal. Also, many of these netbook machines will be given away to get wireless subscriptions and so on - again, $15 is a big deal.

But there are even more reasons why this is bad news for Microsoft. I'll explore those in that later post.


Printer Friendly Version

Have you tried Searching this site?

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us

Printer Friendly Version

There are only two things wrong with C++: The initial concept and the implementation. (Bertrand Meyer)

Linux posts

Troubleshooting posts

This post tagged:




Unix/Linux Consultants

Skills Tests

Unix/Linux Book Reviews

My Unix/Linux Troubleshooting Book

This site runs on Linode