APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

Disappointed with LDAP

When I first looked at LDAP ( LDAP Basics) I was moderately excited about the potential. When Microsoft started using it for their user information, it seemed like the world of integrated user databases was very, very close.

But it hasn't turned out that way quite yet. Microsoft of course does the usual things to make it difficult to interface with them, but I think a lot of the fault lies with LDAP : not the code, but with lousy documentation. This thread is a good example of that: confused people, things that don't quite work right, and so on. On the other hand, there are some good links to be had there, and some hope that this actually does work here and there and that the future may even be better.

Got something to add? Send me email.

(OLDER)    <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

-> -> Disappointed with LDAP


Increase ad revenue 50-250% with Ezoic

More Articles by

Find me on Google+

© Tony Lawrence

Well, despite your articles and your help, 2 books and many hours I have never been able to make LDAP work for me. The entire thing is prolix. I see there is a new O'Reilly book on the subject:

LDAP System Administration
By Gerald Carter
March 2003
ISBN: 1-56592-491-6
308 pages, $39.95 US, $61.95 CA, 28.50 UK

Maybe I'll have another run at it...


We use LDAP at our company currently as a company wide email addressbook, which can be used in Mozilla Mail, or our company webmail, squirrelmail. I have not used it for authentication yet. I have found a very easy to use LDAP editor that is written in PHP, called LABE. You can find it here:


It makes adding/modifying or deleting entries painless.

- Bruce Garlock

Kerio Samepage

Have you tried Searching this site?

Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us

Generally, old media don't die. They just have to grow old gracefully. Guess what, we still have stone masons. They haven't been the primary purveyors of the written word for a while now of course, but they still have a role because you wouldn't want a TV screen on your headstone. (Douglas Adams)

This post tagged: