# # Crime and punishment
APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

Crime and punishment

I've removed advertising from most of this site and will eventually clean up the few pages where it remains.

While not terribly expensive to maintain, this does cost me something. If I don't get enough donations to cover that expense, I will be shutting the site down in early 2020.

If you found something useful today, please consider a small donation.



Some material is very old and may be incorrect today

© September 2003 Tony Lawrence

A writer at Ziff-Davis thinks that we should "Make the punishment fit the cybercrime" (link dead, sorry). He thinks that our cyber-crime laws are too tough and that since the two people caught propagating the SoBig virus were not the original authors, their punishment should be lighter.

I disagree, and I'm particularly tired of seeing "youth" and "young men" used as a ploy to gain sympathy. Both of these people are old enough to know better, and tecnically savvy enough to be quite aware of the damage they intended to cause. This isn't the very first Internet worm, where Robert Morris could quite legitimately claim that he had no idea the effects would be so dramatic. These people knew exactly what they were doing.

Here in the U.S., the punishment could theoretically be 10 years to life in prison. People concentrate on the "life" part, but there are good reasons for that being there: cyberattacks could be employed with the intent of shutting down hospitals, causing train wrecks, etc. and in those cases life imprisonment would be appropriate. In this case, the intent was business disruption, so the lighter end is more fitting. But that's why these laws are written with these broad ranges: exactly to "let the punishment fit the crime".

The SoBig worm continues to flood mailboxes today, weeks after its release. MSBLAST disrupted business and caused significant expense for untold numbers of businesses. The article I referenced says that "It's time to put cyber punishments in perspective". I agree, and my perspective is that these things cost a lot of money, a lot of time, and decrease quality of life for everyone. Let the punishment reflect that.


If you found something useful today, please consider a small donation.



Got something to add? Send me email.





(OLDER)    <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

->
-> Crime and punishment


Inexpensive and informative Apple related e-books:

Take Control of iCloud

Take Control of Apple Mail, Third Edition

Take Control of Upgrading to El Capitan

Take Control of the Mac Command Line with Terminal, Second Edition

Sierra: A Take Control Crash Course





More Articles by © Tony Lawrence





Printer Friendly Version

Have you tried Searching this site?

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us


Printer Friendly Version





UNIX does not allow path names to be prefixed by a drive name or number; that would be precisely the kind of device dependence that operating systems ought to eliminate. (Andrew S. Tanenbaum)




Linux posts

Troubleshooting posts


This post tagged:

Blog



Unix/Linux Consultants

Skills Tests

Unix/Linux Book Reviews

My Unix/Linux Troubleshooting Book

This site runs on Linode