APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

Stolen Software

© December 2004 Tony Lawrence
Referencing: https://www.libervis.com/modules/weblog/details.php?blog_id=17

I guess this article really shouldn't have surprised me, but it did. As the author says:

The truth is that this church doesn't operate this way because they want to, it is because they have to, at least in their mind. They have a budget for IT of a few hundred dollars a year and with the age of their systems that is barely enough to cover repair costs. There is no way this church with its current mindset and budgetary restrictions could handle becoming legal in terms of software licensing. But even if they could, would that really be the best thing? I mean their accounting software releases a new version every year, Windows; which is the OS in use, is updated every few years and other bits of their software are updated on varying schedules. There is no feasible way they could keep up to date and remain legal in terms of licensing, so instead they steal the software. YES, I am going to say it, even though I hate everything about proprietary software licensing practices they are stealing according to the letter of the law, and yet there are those in the church who will try to justify it. I will not bother discussing their justifications because they are idiotic at best.

As I said, this really shouldn't be a great shock. I see this same software theft all the time in companies. However, I do think it's often a little bit different. I certainly have run across companies that deliberately and knowingly pirate software, but more often the pirating was done at the individual level rather than being corporate policy. When I bring this to the attention of the owners or managers, the usual reaction is along the lines of "Fix that. Now".

The author of this blog suggests that the churches solution is pretty obvious: they ought to be using Open Source rather than proprietary solutions. I would bet that would be an easier sell to a church than it is to most businesses, though I suppose the resistance could be every bit as strong. On the other hand, most businesses are probably less cash-starved than many churches are.

The pain of switching has to be balanced against the costs of proprietary software. For a business, likely having more available cash, any pain may be seen as too much. But is the pain all that much now? Are we nearing a tipping point where businesses will start to switch in great numbers?

Or at least churches and other non-profits?

Got something to add? Send me email.

(OLDER)    <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

-> Stolen Software


Inexpensive and informative Apple related e-books:

Take Control of Upgrading to El Capitan

Take Control of iCloud

Take Control of the Mac Command Line with Terminal, Second Edition

iOS 10: A Take Control Crash Course

Take Control of Parallels Desktop 12

More Articles by © Tony Lawrence

I found the subject article an interesting read. Not much on that front appears to have changed since the days when churches were using Trash-80's and CBM PETs to do their work. The only difference was that back then, they didn't have to pay the Microsoft tithe.


I've been trying to get our church on the open source wagon -- or, at least, trying to make a plan to do so. Yes, you should be able to sell a church on open source's costs alone, but a lot of times the people making the IT decisions are pointy-hair managers at work -- they use M$, everyone uses M$. You don't? You're weird.

Anyway, my plan is to influence those people into using it had home and soon it will go to the church. I already have convinced many people to use OpenOffice and all of them like it better. Honestly, I can't see any reason why people would use M$ Office for most office-type things anymore.

There is a website dedicated to Open Source in the church -- see

-- MikeHostetler

---December 17, 2004

Tue Jul 26 23:49:37 2005: 883   anonymous

What is open source software?

Wed Jul 27 01:12:43 2005: 884   TonyLawrence

At the most basic level, open source means that the source code is supplied with the application. Beyond that, licemsing determines what you can and can't do with that source code.


Printer Friendly Version

Have you tried Searching this site?

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us

Printer Friendly Version

The teaching of BASIC should be rated as a criminal offence: it mutilates the mind beyond recovery. (Edsger W. Dijkstra)

Linux posts

Troubleshooting posts

This post tagged:




Unix/Linux Consultants

Skills Tests

Unix/Linux Book Reviews

My Unix/Linux Troubleshooting Book

This site runs on Linode