# # Who do you trust?
APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

Who do you trust?

I've removed advertising from most of this site and will eventually clean up the few pages where it remains.

While not terribly expensive to maintain, this does cost me something. If I don't get enough donations to cover that expense, I will be shutting the site down in early 2020.

If you found something useful today, please consider a small donation.



Some material is very old and may be incorrect today

© August 2004 Tony Lawrence

Referencing: Who Do You Trust, The Wiki Or The Reporter?

The above link leads to an interesting TechDirt article where a traditional reporter complains about the inherent inaccuracy of information sources such as Wikipedia etc. The reporter's claim boils down to simply that you can't trust the rabble, and you need experts (reporters, one presumes) to present facts.

Well, OK. It's true that sometimes you can't trust a mob. When a subject becomes emotionally charged (for example the SCO Lawsuit), it's quite possible for mob-rule sources to be distorted by emotions and make it impossible for a balanced view to be presented.

But that's also true of reporters and "experts". Back before the Wright brothers, you could find plenty of scientific "experts" who could explain why mechanical flight was impossible.

From The Wright Brothers Chapter Seven:


More than once Professor Newcomb had written that flight without gas-bags would require the discovery of some new metal or a new unsuspected force in Nature. Then, in an article in The Independent - October 22, 1903, while the Wrights were at Kitty Hawk assembling their power machine - he not only proved that trying to fly was nonsense, but went further and showed that even if a man did fly, he wouldn't dare to stop. "Once he slackens his speed, down he begins to fall. - Once he stops, he falls a dead mass. How shall he reach the ground without destroying his delicate machinery? I do not think that even the most imaginative inventor has yet put on paper a demonstrative, successful way of meeting this difficulty."

Later, similar experts would expound upon why physics would not allow us to travel faster than the speed of sound. There are many other examples and they continue to this day - probably always will.

So really, the same arguments about prejudice and inaccuracy apply everywhere. You can't implicitly trust Wikipedia or the New York Times. The librarian quoted in the original article (link dead, sorry) says "part of my job is to help my students develop critical thinking skills"; those are just as necessary with any source, no matter what its reputation is.

However, bulletin boards, newsgroups, and Wikis at least offer the potential for other views to creep in. You get to read other points of view, unsanitized by corporate policy. Yes, that can let a lot of junk in also, but if you are thinking logically, the junk should fall out rather easily. Personally, I'd rather read multiple points of view and decide for myself.


If you found something useful today, please consider a small donation.



Got something to add? Send me email.





(OLDER)    <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

->
-> Who do you trust?


Inexpensive and informative Apple related e-books:

Take Control of High Sierra

Sierra: A Take Control Crash Course

Take Control of OS X Server

Are Your Bits Flipped?

Digital Sharing Crash Course





More Articles by © Tony Lawrence



'At the mouth of two or three witnesses is a matter established' - a bad paraphrase from an ancient law code. The principle still stands. Selecting information from a single source is prone to error, even from "known experts." When verified by several independent sources, information can be more reliable.
---August 31, 2004



---August 31, 2004

Yes, though sometimes you don't know what to think. I've mentioned this before in the context of the SCO lawsuit - I can't trust my own feelings because I'm too prejudiced (against SCO), and I wonder if my understanding of my own prejudice affects my feelings toward other peoples opinions - in other words, I don't trust them because I don't trust myself.

--TonyLawrence





Printer Friendly Version

Have you tried Searching this site?

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us


Printer Friendly Version





If you have any trouble sounding condescending, find a Unix user to show you how it's done. (Scott Adams)




Linux posts

Troubleshooting posts


This post tagged:

Blog

Opinion



Unix/Linux Consultants

Skills Tests

Unix/Linux Book Reviews

My Unix/Linux Troubleshooting Book

This site runs on Linode