# # SCO defends its lawsuit
APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

SCO defends its lawsuit

I've removed advertising from most of this site and will eventually clean up the few pages where it remains.

While not terribly expensive to maintain, this does cost me something. If I don't get enough donations to cover that expense, I will be shutting the site down in early 2020.

If you found something useful today, please consider a small donation.



Some material is very old and may be incorrect today

© August 2004 Tony Lawrence

Referencing: http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php/id;97798672;fp;2;fpid;1


Everyone knows Linux is an unlicensed version of Unix
 

So says Kieran O'Shaughnessy, director of SCO Australia and NZ.

I'm not sure "everyone" knows that. We all can certainly agree that Linux is a Unix clone. O'Shaughnessy asserts that IBM made a "Rolls-Royce" out of a "bicycle" by stealing SCO's code and putting it into Linux. I guess I could agree that Linux was like a bicycle at some point, though I'm not sure any current OS could rightfully be likened to a Rolls-Royce. But OK, the assertion is that IBM juiced up Linux with SCO's code, and O'Shaughnessy says that will all come out in court.

I'm sorry, but I hope not.

No, I'm not part of the Groklaw sing-a-long that insists there is no code and never was. I suspect that it's far from unlikely that IBM has done just what SCO says it has. Proving it will undoubtedly be tough, but that's SCO's problem. My concern is what happens if they do prove it.

O'Shaughnessy says that

SCO doesn't just expect financial compensation but removal of the stolen code
 

And more licensing fees, of course, though I don't quite understand how you can have that both ways: pay me a fee to use the Linux that no longer has my stolen code in it? I must be missing something..

But SCO is missing more. Linux has been and is the ONLY real hope for Unix like operating systems. Oh, yeah, we might have a few BSD servers and here's always Mac OS X, but both of those are helped by the success of Linux and would not do as well as they do without it. Kill Linux, and Microsoft will shortly put SCO down forever and then clean up the loose ends.

That's my worry here. If SCO wins, they certainly aren't going to replicate Linux's success: they had that chance years ago and blew it totally. No, they'll just get banged around by Big Bully Gates and disappear entirely. So they actually end up losing, and the rest of us of course lose even more.


If you found something useful today, please consider a small donation.



Got something to add? Send me email.





(OLDER)    <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

->
-> SCO defends its lawsuit


Inexpensive and informative Apple related e-books:

El Capitan: A Take Control Crash Course

Photos for Mac: A Take Control Crash Course

Take Control of the Mac Command Line with Terminal, Second Edition

Take Control of Preview

Take Control of Parallels Desktop 12





More Articles by © Tony Lawrence





Printer Friendly Version

Have you tried Searching this site?

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us


Printer Friendly Version





The man who receives five thousand dollars a year wants six thousand dollars a year, and the man who owns eight or nine hundred thousand dollars will want a hundred thousand dollars more to make it a million, while the man who has his millions will want everything he can lay his hands on and then raise his voice against the poor devil who wants ten cents more a day. (Samuel Gompers)




Linux posts

Troubleshooting posts


This post tagged:

SCO Lawsuit

Linux

Opinion

Unix



Unix/Linux Consultants

Skills Tests

Unix/Linux Book Reviews

My Unix/Linux Troubleshooting Book

This site runs on Linode