APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

IBM won't use patents against Linux - unless it has to

© August 2004 Tony Lawrence
Referencing: Complacency and bravado

From: Open Source Stress:

"IBM has no intention of ever asserting its patent portfolio 
against the Linux kernel unless forced to," [ IBM senior VP ] Donofrio said.

Unless forced to?

Those Linux fans who are so certain that they need never fear IBM need to think about just what that means. Very simply, it means that IBM isn't completely sure that Darl McBride and Steve Ballmer aren't right about Linux and Open Source killing the profitability of software.

IBM is hoping that its dabbling in open source will both hurt Microsoft and help IBM sell its for-profit software and hardware. But what if its potential customers start getting skittish like the city of Munich apparently has? Well, that might "force" IBM to look at different options.

What kind of options might that be? IBM certainly wouldn't want to throw all this away - they need something to pitch against Microsoft, and I doubt they'd ever again make the mistake of crawling into bed with Gates and Ballmer. So how can you keep pushing Linux if it started losing momentum due to patent fears? Well, if you have the right patents, and could bully or cajole certain other holders (HP? SCO?) into seeing the Brave New World as you see it, maybe you make a bid to take control. Yes, I mean try to convince the courts that the only "legal" Linux version is yours and the people you license. Maybe SCO and HP etc. get a piece of the pie, and maybe even Microsoft plays along because it turns Linux into a more ordinary commercial competitor. Everybody's happy - well, not everybody, but all the big boys sure are.

Outrageous? Sure. Ridiculous? Maybe. But what else could Donofrio mean by "unless forced to" ? OK, yes, it's a cabal conspiracy theory made up out of almost thin air. And, so far anyway, there's no rising tide of Linux defections from patent fears. For every Fidelity (mentioned in the Information Week article as being negative about open source), there are probably a hundred little companies that nobody has ever heard of running free software. But - Fidelity's opinions will get more attention than Joe's Pizzeria, so if we start seeing too much of that noise from the wrong places, it's definitely not good.

This whacko future conspiracy theory may indeed be unimaginable. There must be a more reasonable explanation of what "unless forced to" means, right? Right?

Got something to add? Send me email.

(OLDER)    <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

-> IBM won't use patents against Linux - unless ithas to

1 comment

Inexpensive and informative Apple related e-books:

Digital Sharing Crash Course

Take Control of Apple Mail, Third Edition

Photos for Mac: A Take Control Crash Course

Are Your Bits Flipped?

Take Control of Numbers

More Articles by © Tony Lawrence

Tue Mar 22 21:57:03 2005: 224   anonymous

Take a look to a valuable IBM patent resource


Printer Friendly Version

Have you tried Searching this site?

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us

Printer Friendly Version

I always knew that one day Smalltalk would replace Java. I just didn't know it would be called Ruby. (Kent Beck)

Linux posts

Troubleshooting posts

This post tagged:




Unix/Linux Consultants

Skills Tests

Unix/Linux Book Reviews

My Unix/Linux Troubleshooting Book

This site runs on Linode