Microsoft proprietary information in SCO
I've removed advertising from most of this site and will eventually clean up the few pages where it remains.
While not terribly expensive to maintain, this does cost me something. If I don't get enough donations to cover that expense, I will be shutting the site down in early 2020.
If you found something useful today, please consider a small donation.
Some material is very old and may be incorrect today
© November 2004 Bruce Garlock
Tue Nov 23 13:25:59 2004 Posted by Bruce Garlock
I recently had to edit /etc/conf/cf.d/mtune to change a shared memory parameter on an OSR5 machine, and noticed this statement at the top:
* This Module contains Proprietary Information of Microsoft * Corporation and should be treated as Confidential.
What on earth could Microsoft have that is proprietary with tuning the SCO kernel?
- Bruce Garlock
If you found something useful today, please consider a small donation.
Got something to add? Send me email.
(OLDER) <- More Stuff -> (NEWER) (NEWEST)
Printer Friendly Version
-> -> Microsoft proprietary information in SCO
Inexpensive and informative Apple related e-books:
Take control of Apple TV, Second Edition
Take Control of Parallels Desktop 12
Take Control of Preview
Take Control of iCloud
Take Control of iCloud, Fifth Edition
More Articles by Bruce Garlock © 2011-04-28 Bruce Garlock
Computers are like Old Testament gods; lots of rules and no mercy. (Joseph Campbell)
This post tagged:
Skills Tests
Unix/Linux Book Reviews
My Unix/Linux Troubleshooting Book
This site runs on Linode
---November 23, 2004
All kinds of things. Microsoft (like IBM etc.) has all manner of patents. No doubt Microsoft royalties help keep SCO expensive, too. It's all pretty disgusting when you really see what is going on. We get sold on the idea that patents are for protecting the lone inventor, but in fact nothing could be farther from the truth. Patents let big companies keep on bullying the little folk.
--TonyLawrence
---November 23, 2004
I only saw this (c)opyright in mtune. The other files do not have the copyright notice in it. Why would they put it in mtune, and not some of the other files in /etc/conf/cf.d?
Printer Friendly Version
Microsoft proprietary information in SCO Copyright © November 2004 Bruce Garlock
Have you tried Searching this site?
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.
Contact us
Printer Friendly Version