Is the solution for privacy openness?

Google has updated its privacy policy. They want us to know that employees don't necessarily have access to the data they collect and that they promise to criminally prosecute any employee who violates those boundaries.

It's all great, and I'm sure that the people responsible really believe what they wrote. But it's a big company, and just as lawyers can differ over the interpretation of a contract, privacy policies can be read in varying context. Beyond that, you have to catch somebody before you can prosecute them. Google's incredible wealth of personal information is too tempting to remain free of avarice.

There is a simple way for Google to eliminate all its privacy concerns: make it all open.

That is, make it possible for anyone, anywhere, to have access to everything Google knows about you and me, right down to ip address, date, time, pages visited (collected from Adsense data), and so on. They'd never do that, of course, and if they did we'd all be screaming bloody blue murder. And yet, that data is potentially available now, policy guidelines be damned.

Sometimes I think that openness is the only final answer. If you don't have privacy anywhere, your privacy can't be abused. Your behavior might change: if you know that video cameras are watching you wherever you are, you won't be breaking littering laws. If every keystroke you type at your computer is available to the world, you aren't likely to be soliciting sex from minors.

We'd lose a lot in such a world, and it's impossible for most of us to imagine going willingly to such an Orwellian existence. Yet technology may make it impossible for us to avoid: if people can record our activity without our knowledge, it might be better to just make everything transparent so that we know what everyone else is up to also. Knowledge is power, as they say, and fortunes are made and lost with secrecy. Our world is slowly becoming more transparent, so keeping secrets is more and more difficult. Perhaps the day will come when we'll just drop all the veils.

Google isn't dropping much right now, of course.


Technorati tags:




ad

Enter your email address for automatic notification of new posts here
(be sure to whitelist 'feedburner.com' if you use spam filtering)

Or use any RSS reader

Delivered by FeedBurner


Views for this page
Today This Week This Month This Year  Overall
1728203 1,172

Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.

Publishing your articles here

pavatar.jpg
More:
       - Web/HTML
       - Blogging




Unix/Linux Consultants

Your ad here - $48.00 yearly!

http://www.schewanick.com SCO Unix, Solaris, Linx (various), PHP, MySQL, Apache, uniBasic, dL4, Perl, System Administration and more....


http://www.m3ipinc.com Security, firewalls, ids, audits, vulnerability assesments, BS7799, HIPAA, GLB, incident handling


SCO, OpenServer, UnixWare, software, servers, security, networks, installation, administration, troubleshooting, maintenance, Watchguard, firewalls, VPNs, e-mail. Visit us at http://opensystemscomputing.com and www.go2unix.com.



Twitter
  • Nov 21 07:55
    @loudmouthman: correct, but how do you prove ANYTHING like that is accurate? You can't. A text file is no better or worse than anything.
  • Nov 21 07:40
    @loudmouthman: well, a digital signature could prove it hadn't been altered. Text is no more insecure than anything else in that sense.









Change Congress


Related Posts