2005/08/04 Plagiarism and copyright

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery, but outright theft is an entirely different matter. I'm pretty liberal about allowing people to use articles from this site; almost everything here is free to use if you include a link back to here and a proper copyright notice. Unfortunately, some people just don't seem to care, or want to obfuscate the source of their content.

For example, with the help of http://www.copyscape.com/, I recently found a site that used a number of my articles, but put their own copyright notice at the bottom, and only included an indirect link back to here: they listed me as the author, and clicking that link brought you to a page that had my site link. That's not acceptable: they can't say that my content is under their copyright, and I want the link in the page itself.

So what to do? Well, the first step is to write to them pointing out the problem and asking them to fix it. I did that on July 26th.

If they ignore you, the next step is to contact their ISP, explaining the problem, and asking that they contact the site requesting compliance or removal.

In this case, I didn't have to go to that extent. The webmaster fixed the problem immediately and sent me a nice note telling me what he had done. It was just a simple misunderstanding, and was corrected to my complete satisfaction.

When these simple attempts don't work, http://www.marketingsherpa.com/sample.cfm?contentID=3036 explains that advertisers like Google will pay attention to your complaints, but apparently won't do much. Other people have reported the same frustration with Google in similar circumstances.

After that, well, it gets harder. http://www.problogger.net/archives/2004/12/21/what-to-do-when-someone-steals-your-blogs-content-blog-plagiarism/ shows some of the frustration you can have. When you are providing free content, it's hard to justify expensive legal action, and if the offender is in another country, it may be nearly impossible anyway.




Enter your email address for automatic notification of new posts here
(be sure to whitelist 'feedburner.com' if you use spam filtering)

Or use any RSS reader

Delivered by FeedBurner


ad

Views for this page
Today This Week This Month This Year  Overall
11647317 1,275

Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.

Publishing your articles here

pavatar.jpg
More:
       - Web/HTML
       - Blogging




Unix/Linux Consultants

Your ad here - $48.00 yearly!

http://www.cleverminds.net Need expert advice? Want a second opinion? CleverMinds is a one-stop-shop for a wide range of technology solutions. We support Unix, Linux, SCO as well as CMS, ecom, blogs, podcasts, search engines consulting and more. Contact us at web2.0@cleverminds.net 0r (617) 894-1282


http://bcstechnology.net Full service Linux & UNIX systems integrator; Windows to UNIX/Linux Client-Server Specialist; Secure E-Mail & Website Hosting; Thoroughbred Software Developer; Custom Industrial Automation; Hardware & Electronics Experts; In Business Since 1985.


UBB Computer Services Support for Openserver, Unixware and Linux. Windows integration with Unix/Linux servers. Hardware, Backup and Networking issues. Located near Sacramento CA, we provide onsite support throughout Northern CA and Nationwide via remote access. We are a SCO Authorized Partner and a Microlite BackupEdge Certified Reseller.



Twitter
  • Nov 21 07:55
    @loudmouthman: correct, but how do you prove ANYTHING like that is accurate? You can't. A text file is no better or worse than anything.
  • Nov 21 07:40
    @loudmouthman: well, a digital signature could prove it hadn't been altered. Text is no more insecure than anything else in that sense.









Change Congress


Related Posts