While I don't see this as often as I used to, every now and then somebody suggests "securing" some service like ssh by running it on a non-standard port. There may have been a time when that offered some protection from uninvited guests, but that time is long gone: nowadays the folks on the outside will routinely try every port. Only the most naive of interlopers will be fooled by your use of a different port.
However, you may still have accomplished something useful if you have done everything else appropriate. For one thing, you have slowed the attacker down. Rather than just knocking at port 22's door, they have to go hunting for ssh. You've also made them "noisier", and thus easier for intrusion detection software to notice.
You might even be able to confuse him by running a false ssh service at the standard port and your real ssh elsewhere. The "false" ssh might use a configuration file that actually can't let anyone in - possibly wasting more of the attacker's time. This is a partial honeypot. I'm not sure this really does much (other than waste more of your bandwidth and cpu), but it might provide perverse amusement. Do keep in mind that a flawed honeypot is a dangerous toy; if you try to get too clever it may backfire on you.
I ran across this interesting idea for wireless lans: http://www.blackalchemy.to/project/fakeap/ broadcasts fake wireless access points, the idea being that your real router is hiding among them.
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar