APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

Premium Content, Deep Web, Micropayments and Google

Update 2011:

Since this was written, Google has introduced Click-Free, which lets sites allow initial access to visitors but lock them out of deep visits and now OnePass, which is similar but more flexible and powerful.

Rumour has it that Google will be introducing a Paypal like payment system. Interestingly. Yahoo has recently introduced search for the "deep web" - the part of the web that wants your money in exchange for reading their content. Some folks see these ideas as connected.

I have little doubt that Google can compete with PayPal or perhaps even replace it entirely (Google says that's not their intent, though). It's the next step that I question: the idea that Google will front-end access to the premium content by some sort of all-in-one subscription service or subscription packaging similar to what cable TV providers do. I suppose it's possible, but I still think the amount of free content on the web will keep premium content in extremely tight niches.

What about the low end? Certainly there are plenty of now free blogs who would love to charge something for access to their content. Perhaps Google will try to revive the idea of micropayments: they'd charge you a subscription fee for certain subject areas - let's say ten dollars a month for tech subjects. They'd then have to convince a lot of content providers like me that I'd be better off if I let Google syndicate my content. They'd then dribble out micropayments to the sites as people visited - this is just the mirror image of advertisement supported sites.

I don't see it. First, I think there is a benefit to advertising supported sites: if you land on a page of mine that isn't quite what you wanted, an ad on that page might just be exactly what you wanted. But then nothing says you can't have both: advertising and syndication can mix. But more important, I think, is resistance from both the consumers and the providers. Consumers aren't going to embrace a subscription model unless all the free sources dry up - it's Gresham's law for the web. In turn, the content providers aren't going to risk switching their model unless they see the same trend. I just can't see this happening.



Got something to add? Send me email.





(OLDER)    <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

-> -> Premium Content, Deep Web, Micropayments and Google


1 comment



Increase ad revenue 50-250% with Ezoic


More Articles by

Find me on Google+

© Tony Lawrence







Sun Jul 10 09:50:24 2005: 771   TonyLawrence

gravatar

I think this (long) rebuttal is more on the mark: (link)

It's just not going to happen. We're stuck with ads..




------------------------
Kerio Samepage


Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us





Perl: The only language that looks the same before and after RSA encryption. (Keith Bostic)

I love deadlines. I love the whooshing noise they make as they go by. (Douglas Adams)







This post tagged: