These are lower speed, smaller L2 cache Pentiums. The problem is that there isn't a lot of price differential any more, so unless you are really shopping at the very bottom, there's not much point in buying these. On the other hand, processor speeds are so high anyway, if you are buying for just a desktop web/email machine, having a faster processor probably doesn't matter, so you might as well save a few dollars.
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
The smaller cache is much more a hindrance to performance than the lower clock speeds. Actually, the high end Celerons run almost as fast as the Pentium 4, the later being a somewhat brain-dead design with its ridiculously deep pipeline. It was also discovered that higher end Celerons could be run in a dual-Pentium motherboard.
Now, if you want performance and a more reasonably price, forget the Intel processors and use AMD Athlons.
--BigDumbDinosaur
The smaller cache is much more a hindrance to performance than the lower clock speeds. Actually, the high end Celerons run almost as fast as the Pentium 4, the later being a somewhat brain-dead design with its ridiculously deep pipeline. It was also discovered that higher end Celerons could be run in a dual-Pentium motherboard.
Now, if you want performance and a more reasonably price, forget the Intel processors and use AMD Athlons.
--BigDumbDinosaur
The smaller cache is much more a hindrance to performance than the lower clock speeds. Actually, the high end Celerons run almost as fast as the Pentium 4, the later being a somewhat brain-dead design with its ridiculously deep pipeline. It was also discovered that higher end Celerons could be run in a dual-Pentium motherboard.
Now, if you want performance and at a more reasonable price, forget the Intel processors and use AMD Athlons.
--BigDumbDinosaur
The smaller cache is much more a hindrance to performance than the lower clock speeds. Actually, the high end Celerons run almost as fast as the Pentium 4, the later being a somewhat brain-dead design with its ridiculously deep pipeline. It was also discovered that higher end Celerons could be run in a dual-Pentium motherboard.
Now, if you want performance and at a more reasonable price, forget the Intel processors and use AMD Athlons.
--BigDumbDinosaur
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar