Twitter Deaf

I've been thinking about this for a while, but this morning's post over at Men With Pens tipped me over the edge: I'm no longer going to follow anyone who follows too many people.

Why? Because you are "Twitter deaf" if you follow more than a few hundred people. Even that many may be too many - right now I'll be un-following if you follow more than 300 people, but I may cut that back even more - we'll see how it goes.

I think it's simple to understand: if you are following that many people, you can't really "hear" me. If I'm following too many, I can't "hear" you - we're both Twitter deaf.

I started this morning un-following manually. I had 189 people when I started and I cut out 28 that way, but I need to write a program to automate the process.. I think that will be my project for today!

Destroying Twitter Friendships with twitterdeaf.pl

I cut my Twitter following list down to less than 50 people by un-following people who are TwitterDeaf. It's wonderful!

Click here to add your comments




Wed Jan 21 13:36:08 2009: Subject:   NickBarron


Makes sense to me.

But then what would I know, I don't use twitter facebook myspace beebo etc etc etc. But you're logic is sound.



Wed Jan 21 17:25:13 2009: Subject:   BrettLegree
http://6weeks.ca

I can see your point for sure. As I said at MwP, I have a custom group in Tweetdeck for the "can't miss" folks (you're in there too).

I wonder sometimes if that shouldn't be my follow list.



Wed Jan 21 17:50:47 2009: Subject:   TonyLawrence


I stupidly forgot about Twitters 100 api calls per hour so overran my limit testing my script - now I have to wait an hour to test it again :-)



Wed Jan 21 18:52:25 2009: Subject:   Leo
http://leodimilo.com/internetmarketingblog/114-things-i-wish

I have to agree. Personally, if you are following twitterheads that are making 10 tweets a day, the number should be much lower. (that is 500 messages a day you have to dig through!)

There are some days that I don't even bother looking at tweets because it is really nothing more than a huge time waster.

I do understand the idea behind following and collecting "friends" though. I just don't agree that it really does much.



Tue Mar 3 22:37:29 2009: Subject: twitter-deaf   MarkGuadalupe
http://twitter.com/mak1e

I think I might follow your tip and do the same thing, its just that I hate it when I checked manually who is not following me, so I might pick carefully who am I going to follow and un-follow, cheers.



Sat Aug 22 05:11:30 2009: Subject: Thought 'Twitter-deaf' was going to be a play on tone-deaf   anonymous


I expected this page to be about people who breach twitter-etiquite. It might be better to unfollow people based on the total tweets per day of the people they follow. A person who follows fifty tweet-happy twits could get more per day than someone who follows 500 'normal' people.

If the API tracked whether tweets were read or not, and the percentage of tweets read vs unread by a particular twit, that would also be a better indicator of their Tweet-deafness, or excess of free time.



Sat Aug 22 10:00:37 2009: Subject:   TonyLawrence


That's certainly true - my cutoffs are crude and arbitrary.

Still, if you are "following" thousands of people, you can't possibly be paying any attention to many of them.

---

Control Spam and Viruses

Run your own mailserver

---

Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email

Click here to add your comments

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar

Jump to Comments

Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.

Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.

We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.