Why I don't trust RSS subscriber figures

I've said before that I'm skeptical about the value of RSS subscribers. Don't misunderstand: I think it is very important to provide RSS feeds; I just don't think counting subscribers means much.

I've given reasons for that:

Just because an RSS reader is fetching a feed doesn't mean that any human being is still actively reading the posts in that feed - they might be scanning the headlines only or might have just forgotten about it entirely - yet that person who is actually not reading anything gets counted as a subscriber. Subscriber yes, reader, who knows?

I realized today that putting Adsense ads on your RSS feeds can help give you a better idea of how many of those supposed subscriptions are really being read. Google's Adsense reports will tell you how many ad impressions are actually seen. Unless someone actually reads the feed, there won't be any Adsense impression.

Unfortunately, what you don't know is whether a reader saw one ad or many. Google puts a variable number of ads into your feeds, and that number is only partially under your control. You also can't control how often people are reading: you might post once per day, but a subscriber might read only once or twice per week. These variables make it impossible to directly correlate Adsense impressions to feed subscribers. However, we can get some clues.

For example, consider that according to Feedburner, we have something around 2,000 RSS subscribers here. As noted, we have no idea how many of those are really reading regularly or at all: all we know is that their RSS reader has been fetching the feed. According to Adsense, there are approximately 2,000 weekly ad impressions from those same feeds .

If all of those 2,000 subscribers were really reading every day, there should be more like 14,000 impressions weekly, right? Therefore, it's obvious that a good number of those supposed readers either do not read, or at least don't read with anything that can display an Adsense ad and thus trigger an impression. I'd guess that the number of actual readers is something closer to 1,000 people or less - possibly quite a bit less!

Again, RSS feeds are an indication of popularity. Obviously a site with 200,000 subscribers is much more valuable than a site with 2,000, no matter what the percentage of actual readers is at either site. At the same time, it is also apparent that in reality, the RSS subscriber figures are probably always overstated.

See also A little help with an RSS experiment?

Click here to add your comments




Wed Oct 7 13:18:10 2009: Subject:   TonyLawrence


I came across this today:

http://www.dailyblogtips.com/dear-reader-who-are-you/

That's a post where the blog author asks his readers to introduce themselves. So far, less than 200 have done so. This is a blog showing almost 32,000 RSS subscribers - and less than 200 have responded?

Now sure, some people will read a post like that and just not respond. But less than 1% of supposed readers? That seems very, very low.

I would bet the same thing would happen here - 1% would be about 20 posts and my bet is that is just about right. I do NOT think that it is primarily reticence and shyness - I think it's forgotten and unread subscriptions, machine fetches and the like that represent the bulk of supposed RSS "subscribers" for APLawrence.com, CopyBlogger, and everyone else.

Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email

Click here to add your comments

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar

Learn Mac OS X Command Line

Jump to Comments

Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.

Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.

We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.