APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

Revealing Ad Income

If you read Google's terms of service, you'll see that you are prohibited from revealing details about the actual performance of ads on your site. Other ad programs have similar restrictions.

I think it's all rather silly. We are allowed to reveal gross revenue, so if I tell you that my sites brought in about $1,300 last month, how hard is it for you to piece together the rest? You can get a very good idea of traffic volume from Google Page Rank, Netcraft, Alexa, et al. and by observing the ads served, can get get very close to the click value. A little backward math fills in all the unknowns, and you know whether you do a lot better or a lot worse than I do. So why all the secrecy and prohibition?

I suppose Google is afraid of being compared head to head against Yahoo and vice versa. There may also be sweet-heart deals in place where certain publishers get better treatment, and the ad suppliers don't want you to notice that. But the other side of that is that both of us, the ad suppliers and we publishers, want to do better at this game, and comparative information helps us improve. If you knew that a PR4 site with x amount of traffic and a mix of type y ads should be grossing around z dollars per month, you'd work hard to improve if you aren't doing z. Without that comparison, you don't know if improvements make any real sense: if you are already doing better than most, it's your ideas that should be copied.

I generally think openness and honesty is better for everyone, but the ad providers don't seem to agree.

Links: Why Reveal Your Blogging Income?


Got something to add? Send me email.





Increase ad revenue 50-250% with Ezoic


More Articles by

Find me on Google+

© Tony Lawrence



Kerio Samepage


Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us





Write a paper promising salvation, make it a 'structured' something or a 'virtual' something, or 'abstract', 'distributed' or 'higher-order' or 'applicative' and you can almost be certain of having started a new cult. (Edsger W. Dijkstra)

UNIX does not allow path names to be prefixed by a drive name or number; that would be precisely the kind of device dependence that operating systems ought to eliminate. (Andrew S. Tanenbaum)







This post tagged: