I've recently added Google Plus One Buttons to pages here. I used to have other buttons - Twitter, Facebook "like" and even some others if we go back far enough. I've removed everything else and now have only the Google button.
Why this and not the others? Well, there are several reasons. First, I don't really like these things. There's a dirty underside of tit for tat trading in a lot of this social media tagging and I find that very distasteful. It bothers me to participate in something that is subject to great abuse.
So why use Google PlusOne?
Simply because this is the first social button that directly affects search engine results. If someone recommends a page here by clicking that PlusOne, Google will use that information in its search results.
Although I can't be sure of this, I suspect that the potential for spamming abuse is lower. For example, if somebody goes on a rampage and clicks that button on a few thousand (or even a few hundred) pages here, I would think that Google would recognize those as likely being invalid and would ignore them. They might also be able to detect cross-trading: if John is plussing Mary's pages and Mary is plussing John's, Google could notice that if their pages run Adsense or use Analytics. This may eliminate some of the fraud associated with social recommendations.
So, for now at least, I've added these buttons. People have started using them. I'm not sure what happens when someone not signed in with a Google account does this - I assume Google asks them to create an account (and this may all be tied in with Google's new, still in beta, Google+).
These could become very important. If you have a website and care about Google traffic, you probably should be thinking about adding these.
More Articles by Anthony Lawrence - Find me on Google+
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Fri Jul 1 12:28:48 2011: 9592 TonyLawrence
At another site forum, I see that people are already recommending Plussing your own pages.
I sincerely hope that Google is smart enough to recognize those as invalid.
Wed Jul 6 10:50:05 2011: 9601 NickBarron
Its all a load of rubbish in my opinion.
Be it Facebook, Google or Twitter my brain ignores it all.
I can see the logic with putting the google version on if it will alter search results, but as you say this will be being abused already.
Wed Jul 6 12:23:06 2011: 9602 TonyLawrence
While I would never underestimate the ability of the SEO manipulators, I'm not sure it will be easy to fool Google with this. I'm sure they can create thousands of fake Google accounts one way or another, but it's not so easy to build reputation with those accounts and that may be what matters.
We'll see..
Sun Aug 21 00:23:43 2011: 9723 videoproduction
http://www.webvideos.co.uk
The problem is the few amount of people that are probably on Google+. Most people I know are on Facebook, but only a few people I know are on Twitter. For people really into social media, like us, we are likely to use more SM mediums, but the general public is not. I just don't see that many general users, who are the majority of the users probably anyways, making the transition.
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar