Almost two months ago, Problogger had a little
post on Full Or Partial RSS Feeds - The Great Feed Debate. The great majority of responses were in favor of full feeds.
I was opposed to full feeds at one time, and that was mostly
because of bandwidth: RSS readers can be absolutely stupid about
how often they hit your site, and most seem to pay no attention
to any "updateFrequency" you set in your files. Of course a
full feed is more data than a partial feed, so partial feeds
are less burden on the site. However, I switched my feeds
to Feedburner some time ago, so that's not an issue for me
any longer: it's Feedburner's bandwidth now, not mine.
When I read that post at Problogger, I had only partial feeds -
subject and a few bytes of introductory text. After seeing
the overwhelming opinions there, I figured I had better add
full feeds. I say "add" because I didn't want to just switch
to full feeds overall: I like partial feeds myself, and
there must be at least some people who share that opinion.
So if I offered a choice, at least those minority folks could still
get what they wanted.
So, I created all the new full text feeds, and added a little
blurb to the partial feeds that just notified readers that
a full text version was now available if they wanted to
switch to it. Choice is good, right?
Ok, it's now just about two months later, and although
this isn't exactly the most popular website that ever was, we
do pick up new RSS readers now and then. What I expected
to see was that new readers would gravitate to the Full feeds
and that at least some old readers would switch from partial
Well, yeah, some of that happened. But overall, MOST
readers opted for partial feeds and only a small number
of former partial readers switched to full.. very unexpected.
And partial feeds have grown - even though they are not the default and you have to go out of your way to get them. It's easy to get full, that's the
default. Not so easy to get partial - but people do. What does that tell
So what's the story? I don't know. It could be that I
just haven't given it enough time - after all, two months
really isn't very long. Or it could be that the people
who read and comment at Problogger aren't representative of
the type of people who would read this site. That's actually
what I suspect: I think a lot of the RSS subscribers here
might be very much like me: I subscribe to dozens and dozens
of sites, and all I want to see is a subject and maybe a
little bit of the first paragraph. If I do want to read more,
I'll click through - I really don't want to have the whole
post in front of me.
Well, we'll check back in now and then and see what's
- 10/02/2007: Full 15, Partial 377
- 01/30/2008: Full 128, Partial 413
- 04/24/2008: Full 233, Partial 451
- 05/30/2008: Full 290, Partial 445
- 01/28/2009: Full 445, Partial 487
- 02/18/2009: Full 1080, Partial 587
- 03/24/2009: Full 1202, Partial 597
- 04/28/2009: Full 1210, Partial 617
- 07/22/2009: Full 1239, Partial 620
- 08/19/2009: Full 1400, Partial 834
- 09/17/2009: Full 1457, Partial 732
- 10/15/2009: Full 1676, Partial 652
- 11/10/2009: Full 1723, Partial 647
- 12/17/2009: Full 1715, Partial 670
- 01/12/2010: Full 1841, Partial 675
- 02/26/2010: Full 1964, Partial 698
- 03/31/2010: Full 1975, Partial 670
- 04/28/2010: Full 2099, Partial 685
- 05/19/2010: Full 2113, Partial 684
- 07/21/2010: Full 1789, Partial 606
- 08/18/2010: Full 1926, Partial 658
- 09/28/2010: Full 1987, Partial 685
- 11/20/2010: Full 1975, Partial 663
These are snapshots in time; daily figures fluctuate up and down..
If this page was useful to you, please help others find it:
More Articles by Anthony Lawrence
- Find me on Google+
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site:
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Publishing your articles here
Jump to Comments
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
I am a Kerio reseller. Articles here related to Kerio products reflect my honest opinion, but I do have an obvious interest in selling those products also.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.