Most bloggers use Content Management Systems (CMS from now on) of some sort. These
do what they promise: they manage your pages. I imagine that
many bloggers don't understand much about the underpinnings. At
http://www.takingmytimeback.com/ a review of
CMS software said:
[Movable Type] uses CGI scripts for the under the hood stuff. For that
reason, I have no idea how it does what it does.
That's probably typical, and there's nothing wrong with that. If
you aren't "techy", or even if you are, you may not need to understand
the innards of how your text gets translated into web pages, complete
with RSS feeds and notifications to blogger sites like Technorati etc.
I don't use CMS software. Well, that's not exactly correct: really
I should say that I write my own content management code. I write
these pages in "vi" (a Unix/Linux text editor) at the command line,
and create my pages with Perl scripts that I wrote. Why? I'm as
lazy as the next person, and certainly could use the convenience of
a canned system. Who needs to spend time mucking with scripts when
other people have already written them and undoubtedly done a far better
job? Why go through all this pain?
Security and Control.. and Perl
Those are the reasons. For example, I have often looked longingly
at Drupal. It has the features I need. It has features I want but
have not yet implemented because I haven't written the necessary code.
I have several times leaned so far in that direction I thought that
I would actually start using it, but ..
It's written in php, and I am more comfortable in Perl.
That's not really awful: php isn't such a great leap for a Perl
person, but it would be awkward for quite a while.
But even if it were Perl, it's someone else's code. I'd have
to learn how it works. That's sometimes hard and confusing, and it's
especially hard when you already know how to do something some
other way. It's the same reason I've remained a one fingered typist:
I can bang out 35 WPM with one finger and a thumb now and then,
so every time I try to learn touch typing, I get frustrated because
my early efforts are so slow. If I could stick with it, I could
do far better than the 35 WPM, but crawling along at learning
speed is too painful: I give up and revert to one finger. Learning
how to do something in someone else's code causes the same frustration: to heck with it, I'll do it my way.
Drupal, and every other CMS, has had security problems now and then.
That really bothers me. Not that I can't make my own security goofs,
but mine aren't going to be publically known so that any tenth grader
with an attitude can break into any web site running that particular CMS.
I see the attempted attacks in my logs every day, and I don't want
to expose myself to that. Better to write my own code.
Finally, I'm fussy. When I want something to work a certain way,
that's the way I want it. No "almost" or "it does, but..", I want it
as I want it and that's it. With someone else's code, the only way
to do that is to get in and hack at it. Two things are bad about that:
one is the effort it takes to understand their code well enough to
hack it, and second is that you now probably can't do any upgrades
because of your custom hacks. Again, I'm better off just writing
it all myself.
This is me, though. If you are not the demanding, my way or
the highway type, I have no doubt that you'd be far better off with
a good Content Management System. I'm just the odd duck who has to build it myself.
Technorati tags: blogging
If this page was useful to you, please help others find it:
More Articles by Anthony Lawrence
- Find me on Google+
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Jump to Comments
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.