APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed

Understanding Alexa

Alexa started out as a project to archive the Internet; to keep a history of the then nascent World Wide Web as it developed. While that certainly was an interesting concept, it probably never would have paid the bills. Remnants of that project still exist: Alexa has a "Way back machine" that lets you see older versions of some pages on some sites. You can see some of my old pages there, for an example.

Alexa now also offers a search engine (Google powered, of course). Their added value is to offer additional site ranking and related site information that Goggle doesn't provide. Alexa compiles that part of its data from users of its Alexa Toolbar. Unlike Google's Page Rank, which is a simple 1 to 10 scale, Alexa ranks position: first most popular and on up, presently seeming to end somewhere close to the four million mark.

The lower the ranking, the more popular the site. It's also true that the lower rankings are much more accurate. However, Alexa ranking is strongly skewed by another factor: users of the toolbar are more apt to be interested in site traffic, which means that users are heavily weighted with webmasters and other people involved with web design and advertising. That could explain why sites that sell Internet advertising to other sites get higher positions than you might otherwise expect. TrafficMarketplace (link dead) has been in the top 100 regularly, but its Google Page Rank is only a 5. Contrast that with my site: well above 100,000 for Alexa, but a Google 6. Incidentally, Alexa doesn't rank itself, but Google shows it as an impressive 8.

Trying to improve

Alexa is trying to expand the use of its toolbar (and thus the accuracy of its statistics). They do pack a lot of useful information in, and it is perfectly compatible with the Google Toolbar; you can have both installed in your browser. Recently they have added a pop-up blocker to attract more users. However, the relatively low rate of usage, and its availability only on Windows, means that Alexa rankings, particularly at the low end, aren't accurate. Looking at Google Page Rank in conjunction with the Alexa rank is a reasonable double check, but it's probably good to keep in mind that you need to approach these figures with a healthy dash of skepticism. Still, the information can be helpful: a site claiming high usage that doesn't rank well in Alexa probably is lying to you.

Why not Google?

You really have to wonder why Google doesn't provide this kind of ranking. It's very useful and interesting, and obviously Google is in a far better position to extract more accurate data. Unfortunately, Google only provides its very rough Page Rank number, which is not useful for distinguishing between sites of similar popularity. I have little doubt that if Google were to do this, Alexa would be out of business very quickly. However, at least so far, Google seems to want to keep that sort of information unavailable. It may be that they have intentions of marketing it. Whatever the reason, Alexa is providing a useful service. Help their accuracy by installing their Alexa Toolbar if you can.



Got something to add? Send me email.



4 comments



Increase ad revenue 50-250% with Ezoic


More Articles by

Find me on Google+

© Tony Lawrence




Why would Google be able to "put Alexa out of Business" Google has no ability to measure traffic.

Google's rating is a rating that the thing of the worthiness of the content. Alexa, through their millions of installed toolbars, measures traffic.

Google would have to get many more people to install their toolbar.

It would be nice if Alexa could cut a deal with Microsoft and perhaps Netscape and have the toolbars automatically included with the browsers much as Macromedia does with Flash.

--

Google can also measure traffic through its searches: if you click on a link you found through a google search, they could track that. Add that knowledge to their toolbars and they would have much more knowledge than Alexa does.

--TonyLawrence






Wed Nov 4 11:44:20 2009: 7424   TonyLawrence

gravatar
I hadn't looked at Alexa in some time. I see they've jazzed things up a bit, added demographics and a few other things: (link)







Sun Dec 12 16:05:02 2010: 9160   MikeMcDonnell

gravatar


Alexa and every other site trying to determine true rank of a site relies on data that is skewed by their ability to receive and crunch it. The question I have is Google revealing anything in the Info:? Obviously number of pages indexed has a direct correlation to Google true value of a site and links to: although not complete may provide information. Any insight?



Sun Dec 12 22:47:26 2010: 9162   TonyLawrence

gravatar


Given the amount of false and incestuous linking that goes on today, I think that is of lesser value now - and so does Google, apparently.

------------------------
Kerio Samepage


Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us





Today, kernels are too much obedient servants, blindly doing the bidding of any program that asks. (Tony Lawrence)

[This] reminds me of a quotation from somebody that, whenever he tried to explain the logical structure of a programming language to a programmer, it was like a cat trying to explain to a fish what it feels like to be wet. (Saul Gorn)












This post tagged: