I think we ought to take another look at this supposed mechanical
marvel that was left lying on the beach. The Godsoaked always
prattle on about how wonderfully designed we are, but actually..
we aren't.
If I had the ability to design a sentient creature, I sure wouldn't
make it so that it had to kill other living things for its energy.
Obviously I (Make Believe Buddy) know how to do such things: other
than the oddballs like Venus flytraps, plants don't kill anything.
So I think that's the premise I'd start with: my sentient playthings
will be sunlight gatherers. Much nicer, I think.
Of course, we have that oxygen pollution problem, and maybe
it's difficult to extract enough energy from sunlight for my blessed
children to be very active. I'm not sure we have to be "active"
(what's wrong with contemplation and conversation?) but if we do
need more energy than photosynthesis can provide, surely I could
design something that is also an oxygen consumer. A person
(excuse me, a Godly Person) of Invisible Pal's talents ought
to be able to whip up a neat little self contained package that
had a net zero effect on carbon dioxide/oxygen balances. After
all, it's not like I (speaking for the Improbable Booger) didn't
design the basic physics and chemistry to start with, right? Maybe
I could make it "interesting" by having the males be the photosynthesisers
and the females the oxygen breathers? Whatever. The important
part is that the fuel would not be other living cells- unless maybe
my male produced fuel for the female to burn or something like that.
I bet someday we won't live by the death of other things, animal
or plant. We'll produce our energy in clever and now unimaginable ways.
And at that point, since the Godsoaked will no doubt still be blathering
about Watches and the like, I hope somebody remembers to ask them why their
Creator didn't create them perfect to begin with, why their ancestors
had to kill to survive.
Add your comments