A retiring hedge-fund manager named Andrew Lahde wrote an unusual epitaph for his fund that included some comments about the failures of Government:
I don't agree that corruption is as bad as he thinks it is, but on the other hand I am equally disgusted that it's not a lot better. Most of us probably have the same feelings: we're confused and upset. We want our elected representatives to act with the highest principles and integrity, but we understand that the world is a complicated place and that compromise is the only way that anything can ever get done. We appreciate the values of capitalism and we think that a pure socialist state would ultimately mean less for everyone. On the other hand, we think excesses of wealth at the expense of others is disgusting. We are very ambivalent - "socialism" is a dirty word, but so is "unfettered capitalism". We want a balance, but never seem to get it right.
I don't even agree that the failure to correct the mortgage crisis is a good example of corruption. It has the right elements: large amounts of money, inattention.. but I think that it was just wishful thinking and carelessness, perhaps made even more careless by distractions such as terrorism and the Iraq war.
And by the way: Jefferson, Hamilton and the rest weren't any better. It's easy to pretend that the politicians of the past were better moral stanchions, but they were not. They had their petty moral failures, unholy alliances and self-serving methods just as today's crop does.
Obviously we do get corruption and have always had it, but the system does work. We have watchdogs for government corruption and the worst of it does get fixed. I wish our standards were higher: I'm incensed that Sarah Palin would use the powers of her office in pursuing a personal grudge but I'm more incensed that most people react to that with a shoulder shrug and a comment along the lines of "they all do it". Yes, I understand that when compared to other offenses, Palin's vendetta was small potatoes and that the shoulder shruggers are probably correct to assume that many of our electees would bend their morals just as readily. But should we pass it off so easily?
Probably so. I won't be voting for MCain-Palin, but if I were, I'd have to let my misgivings about her morals slide. After all, what choice would I have? We get to choose from column A or column B and we have to choose someone. We look at the warts and imperfections, squeeze our eyes shut, pinch our noses and hope for the best.
But I wish it were different. I wish that we had higher moral standards. Unrealistic, yes. I know that. But I can't help wishing.
Got something to add? Send me email.
(OLDER) <- More Stuff -> (NEWER) (NEWEST)
Printer Friendly Version
Increase ad revenue 50-250% with Ezoic