That's a serious question. I don't claim to have an answer, of course, but I do think the answer very well could be "Yes".
Windows 7, we barely knew thee
Windows 7 was released in October of 2009 and supposedly Windows 8 ("the biggest overhaul since Windows 95", according to some) will be coming out in 2012.
That's just three years - well, six if you count poor Vista as a precursor to Windows 7. To a slightly befuddled consumer who has heard all about the growing pains of Vista and the peripheral and application incompatibilities that still vex Win 7 to at least some degree, it might look like Microsoft is throwing out a botched attempt to replace XP and is trying again with Windows 8. That's not particularly accurate, but it could look that way to a slightly naive user.
But even if it isn't the hasty retreat from Win 7 that it seems to me, untold millions of computer users have never even put their grubby fingers upon a Windows 7 interface as of yet - they are still running XP and probably will still be running XP for years to come. According to NetMarketShare, Windows XP still hangs on to over 50% of desktops.
That's dropped to 17% as of 2015.
Why? Because you don't fix what isn't broken. Windows 7 usually requires new hardware for anything approaching reasonable performance and it also requires adaptation and re-learning for users. Even if the XP hardware is up to snuff for Win 7, Microsoft has stupidly decided to make upgrades both expensive and confusing (Which Windows 7 is right for you?).
Of course I don't know what Windows 8 will cost, but it's a safe bet Microsoft won't be adopting Apple's new $29.99 pricing. Nor is it likely to require any less hardware - given its tablet inspired interface designs, it will likely need even more power.
The tablet issue
Apple is obviously well on its way to a unified tablet/desktop operating system and that unification is exactly what Microsoft is heading for with Windows 8.
But why? Apple obviously has reason to do this: they are selling millions upon millions of tablets. Microsoft is not selling any and although I know that some readers may be wishing for a decent Windows powered tablet, those folks are in a definite minority. Apple owns most of the tablet space and whatever they don't own is solely controlled by Android. Microsoft has little chance to break into that market.
Well, unless you believe that Windows 8 is the magic panacea that will let them do that. Reasonable people may disagree, but I think any savvy bookmaker will post strong odds against Microsoft's chances. Back in May of this year, some optimistic prognosticators thought Microsoft tablets might catch fire, but reality has splashed ice cold water on that. Other folks were a tad more pessimistic (Gartner forecasts 0% market share for Microsoft mobile tablets in 2015). The pessimists seem to be correct.
But Microsoft still is hanging in:Windows forecast to gradually grab tablet market share from iOS and Android
Pinning to a false premise
What's driving the optimists is summed up in this paragraph from What Does Windows 8 Mean to Microsoft? Maybe Everything:
Sounds reasonable, doesn't it? If you are a Windows enthusiast, this seems to make a lot of sense. If we have device independence unified by a run-anywhere Microsoft operating system, Redmond's success is inevitable.
People buy tablets for their basic functions: browsing, email, music and pictures. None of that needs a Microsoft operating system. Most other tablet apps are written specifically for tablets - porting traditional Windows apps to a tablet interface is not going to be easy - Ars Technica noted:
Looking at this rationally from a developers point of view, if you have to retool your skills, why would you retool for the untested OS with the lowest market share of all? It would seem to be smarter to learn the Apple or Android way and forget Microsoft. I'm not saying all developers will make that choice, but it could be a significant percentage.
Of course there is a way to avoid retooling: run your app in the cloud. The problem there is that cloud apps don't need Microsoft at the client end.
There's a good article at Infoworld titled Windows 8 tablets: How Microsoft can win this time. They point out one of the other gotchas from the development side, noting that apps will need to be rewritten for Windows 8 tablets and that those apps will also be expected to run on Win 8 desktops:
Note that Apple does NOT expect IOS apps to run on its desktops. Microsoft is taking a big gulp of food here, and may find it hard to chew.
Tie it all up with a ribbon
So far, the overall picture isn't smooth sailing for Microsoft. However, we haven't seen what Windows 8 has to offer, have we? There could be killer features in Win 8 that leave Apple and Android lying stunned and impotent in its wake.
Sure, that could be. At least one Win 8 feature certainly does leave me stunned, though perhaps not in the way Microsoft intended. I'm speaking of the new Ribbon interface for their flagship apps.
As one reviewer put it, "Microsoft UI has officially entered the realm of self-parody". If this is the innovation that would cause people to camp out overnight to get their hands on the first release of Windows 8, I'll eat an Android tablet for breakfast. Well, no, that might be a lot to stomach, but you get the idea. It's retrograde, it looks primitive, it's ugly - what were they thinking?
I'll put the odds against them
I expressed similar sentiments to a Microsoft fan last week. He chuckled a little and opined "Microsoft is too big to fail".
Yeah. They do have a lot of free cash and it will take extraordinary incompetence and fumbling to use that up. Yet it seems to me like Windows 8 could be a good start at draining away at least some of that cash advantage.
I'm reminded of other folks who were too powerful to lose their market power and position: IBM, Wang, DEC.. but, yeah, Microsoft is different, right?
Of course they are.
Got something to add? Send me email.
(OLDER) <- More Stuff -> (NEWER) (NEWEST)
Printer Friendly Version
Increase ad revenue 50-250% with Ezoic