APLawrence.com -  Resources for Unix and Linux Systems, Bloggers and the self-employed
RSS Feeds RSS Feeds











(OLDER) <- More Stuff -> (NEWER) (NEWEST)
Printer Friendly Version
->
-> The Linux Nuclear Option


The Linux Nuclear Option



Let loose the hounds of war,
The whirling swords!
Send them leaping afar,
Red in their thirst for war;
Odin laughs in his car
At the screaming of the swords!
Far let the white-ones fly,
The whirling swords!
Afar off the ravens spy
Death-shadows cloud the sky.
Let the wolves of the Gael die
Neath the screaming swords!
The Shining Ones yonder
High in Valhalla
Shout now, with thunder:
Drive the Gaels under,
Cleave them asunder --
Swords of Valhalla!

("The War-Song of the Vikings", Fiona Macleod)

At his blog, www.linux-foundation.org/weblogs/jzemlin/2009/02/26/note-on-microsoft-tomtom-suit-calm-down-hope-for-the-best-plan-for-the-worst/ (link dead, sorry) Jim Zemlin, the executive director of the Linux Foundation asks us all to calm down about Microsoft suing TomTom. He says:

Right now the Microsoft claim against Tom Tom is a private dispute between those two entities concerning GPS mapping software. We do not feel assumptions should be made about the scope or facts of this case and its inclusion, if any, of Linux-related technology.

He goes on to point out that Microsoft itself assures that this has nothing to do with Linux.

Let's pretend we buy that. I don't know why anyone with a working brain would ever trust Microsoft, but maybe Jim Zemlin knows something we don't. We'll take them at their word: this case has nothing to do with Linux.

As long as we're engaging in fantasy, let me also note that the economy will be turning around within six months. Yay!

Jim does say that if Microsoft proves to be less than trustworthy (which has never, ever happened in the past!), the Linux Foundation is ready to meet the threat:

The Linux Foundation is working closely with our partner the Open Invention Network, and our members, and is well prepared for any claims against Linux. We have great confidence in the foundation they have laid. Unfortunately, claims like these are a by-product of our business and legal system today. For now, we are closely watching the situation and will remain ready to mount Linux's defense, should the need arise.

This is the so-called "Nuclear Option". The Open Invention Network supposedly holds a lot of patents that could frustrate and damage Microsoft. If Microsoft attacks Linux, we attack Microsoft. By holding this threat open, we hope to achieve detente.

Where's the carnage?

Let me just ask a question here. If this really could be equated to a "Nuclear Option", shouldn't there be mutual destruction? If OIN and the Linux Foundation did mount an all-out patent war against Microsoft, I can only see two possible outcomes: Microsoft destroys Linux or OIN destroys software patents.

If Microsoft really thought it could destroy Linux, they'd have already pushed the Big Red button. Yeah, yeah, they have to worry a little bit about anti-trust, but between Apple and the deals that Novell and RedHat will trip all over themselves to make, they'd be fine. They wouldn't really kill Linux - they'd only kill free, unlicensed, unencumbered Linux. They'd leave the shell safely contained in Novell, RedHat and anyone else willing to pony up for the chance to be a Microsoft vassal. But apparently they don't have the firepower to do that.

Does OIN really have the nukes? I don't know. My gut feeling is that they do not, but for our purposes here let's assume I'm wrong. Let's say OIN really does have patents that will cause the blood to drain from Ballmer's ruddy cheeks. Let's say that a boardroom packed with Microsoft lawyers will sit in stunned silence if that gambit is played, no advice coming from their shark-like jaws. If that is anything close to reality, why wouldn't we do it now?

Why wait? Why let Microsoft continue to harry our flanks, whisper lies into the ears of legislators, steal markets with predatory pricing? Why not strike now, let loose the hounds of hell?

Wouldn't it be good for the entire world if we could nullify a lot of the ridiculous patents that clog innovation and progress? Might not an all out patent war possibly hasten badly needed reforms? Do we really have anything to lose?

I certainly don't know. Maybe OIN's portfolio is actually too weak. Maybe both OIN and Microsoft are rattling wooden swords. Maybe the hounds of hell are just madly yapping Chihuahua's. Maybe it's all total B.S.?

This was settled: Microsoft, TomTom settle patent dispute




If this page was useful to you, please help others find it:  





5 comments




More Articles by - Find me on Google+



Click here to add your comments
- no registration needed!




Mon Mar 2 21:58:34 2009: 5580   BrettLegree

gravatar
Nuclear Vikings - sign me up.

Does anyone really need to "nuke" Microsoft, though? They seem to be doing a good job of killing themselves already.



Wed Mar 4 16:34:31 2009: 5597   JohnMc
http://thirdpipe.com
gravatar
Well if FOSS wanted to go nuclear they could. However it would require a very deep scan of the whole UNIX landscape from back in the days of Mini's/PDP-11. There were a whole slew of Motif/X11 metaphors that were developed that could be brought forward as a prior art assault.

Just saying.



Wed Mar 4 19:46:10 2009: 5600   TonyLawrence

gravatar
If that's true, then the question becomes "Why not?". Aren't we all sick of Microsoft's FUD? Aren't we all sick of software patents? Why wouldn't we want to try to blow it all up?



Thu Mar 5 18:50:18 2009: 5610   drag

gravatar
It would be nice to blow it up.

It's all really turned into a huge pile of crap. Nowadays people spend much more on patent litigation the anybody actually profits from them. It's turned into a huge racket for lawyers.

What we are witnessing now is nothing less then a wholesale corruption of our legal system. Now we have companies; created, managed, by nothing other then groups of lawyer; whose sole purpose in life is to go out and sue other corporations. That's it. That's all they do. They have no products, they produce no software, they produce nothing at all. They have zero contribution to the economy or technology... All they do is simply go out and purchase patents from failing companies and then proceed to sue anybody with enough money to make it worth their time.

That's the ultimate problem. Companies like Microsoft are easy to deal with because they produce products. Since it's virtually impossible to avoid software patents if your a programmer then Microsoft, by default, is liable to all sorts of different patent lawsuits. So they can be kept in check. So that even though they say "linux" violates "hundreds" of their patents (which is as likely to be true as not) for years this is the first time they've actually gone after a company that uses Linux and they are making sure to tell everybody "we are suing a company, not open source". They are doing this because they are scared and are trying to see how far they can push it before getting nailed to the wall.

However these 'patent troll' companies don't produce any software. They have zero products they produce and the only income they receive is from patent lawsuits and licensing. The 'nuclear option' doesn't affect them... they produce nothing, they do nothing, they sell nothing, so therefore are invulnerable to patents.

The only weapon against those companies we have is the ability to invalidate patents. Invalidating patents is very hard, very expensive, and so far very unlikely to work out. So these patent troll companies just charge less for licensing then what it would cost to defeat them.

Right now. As it stands; The system is just broken and is being gamed.



Thu Mar 5 22:31:28 2009: 5614   drag

gravatar
Here is your chance to make a difference.

In one corner there is a bill in congress to introduce some reforms into the patent system. On there side there is a huge number of technology companies.

In the other corner is the pharmaceutical and biomedical companies as well as 'Non-Practicing Entities' (aka Patent trolls). They want to fight the reform because the current state of affairs is very profitable for them.

Keep in mind that most corporations loose money on patent litigation... both sides the winners and the losers. The 3 major groups of people that still find patents profitable are:
1. pharmaceutical and biomedical companies
2. patent trolls
3. the U.S. patent office.

Yes that is right. The Patent office is the ONLY part of our government that is actually turning a profit. Bizarre as that may sound...

Now I don't know the details of the bill and I may have my facts wrong, but this is your chance to have a say in it.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2009/03/patent-reform-bill-reintroduced-to-tech-industry-cheers.ars

Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email

Click here to add your comments


If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar

Kerio Samepage


Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.

Publishing your articles here

Jump to Comments



Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.

I am a Kerio reseller. Articles here related to Kerio products reflect my honest opinion, but I do have an obvious interest in selling those products also.

Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.

We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.

pavatar.jpg

This post tagged:

       - Linux
       - Microsoft















My Troubleshooting E-Book will show you how to solve tough problems on Linux and Unix systems!


book graphic unix and linux troubleshooting guide



Buy Kerio from a dealer
who knows tech:
I sell and support

Kerio Connect Mail server, Control, Workspace and Operator licenses and subscription renewals



Click and enter your name and phone number to call me about Kerio® products right now (Flash required)