Is Windows Vista's user security elevation better than Mac OS X's? asks the question (and then basically refuses to discuss it).
It is a ridiculous question to start with: Windows Vista doesn't exist except in beta, so the supposed security advantage Vista has may evaporate as Microsoft bends to reality.
The "advantage" touted here involves privilege escalation. When either OS X or Vista needs to do system level tasks, they ask for an administrator password. OS X stores that power (not the password, just the increased privileges) for a small period of time after asking. Apparently current Windows Vista does not.
I don't see this as the InfoWorld author does. First, I think I'd be very annoyed with Windows Vista if it queried me for a password over and over again while I was installing some software. That would get old real fast, and if this truly is how it works, I guarantee Microsoft will be changing that very soon. More to the point is that the moment you give an admin password, you are running some risk, so I think any "security" discussion that starts at this point (admin password given) is inherently silly.
More interesting was a link I noticed in a sidebar: Mac OS X hacked under 30 minutes. That's interesting, but I have to wonder about the apparent confict of the hacker's claim that he used "unpublished exploits -- of which there are a lot for Mac OS X". If they are "unpublished", then how would he know about them unless he invented them himself? OK, maybe these exploits are only available at secret hacker websites, but that isn't really "unpublished", is it? If someone is distributing such information, no matter how restrictively, it will "get out" and it will be fixed.
Also, these reports never really tell us much. Was there a firewall ahead of this box? Why on earth would any sane person set this up so users could add their own accounts? From rm my Mac!, the web page of the hacked person:
I set up an LDAP server and linked it to the Macs naming and authentication services, to let people add their own account to this machine. That way, they will all be able to enjoy the beauty of Mac OS X Tiger. And, of course, get a better chance of rm'ing it!
The story says the machine was hacked, but it seems to be still running. There's some argument at the site itself whether it was hacked at all, if it was whether or not it was patched up to date, and so on. Who knows? I sure don't..
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Mon Mar 6 15:44:20 2006: Subject: bruceg2004
I wondered the same thing about the "unpublished" - how would he know? Anyway, this machine was also more open to the world. Your typical user is, hopefully, not going to have port 80 open, or other ports to the world. As long as you run a firewall, and don't open up any ports, you are pretty much safe in OS X. I am yet to put an OS X machine on the Internet, so I do not have much experience with that. I tend to use linux as a server machine, and OS X for the desktop/development. I run my own web server locally on my PowerBook, and test my PHP from there, and then upload it to my linux box when it has matured enough.
I would like to see more on this "unpublished" claim. Does Apple really have so many security bugs that have been fixed by other vendors' Unix versions for years? This is going to get interesting. I hope Apple jumps on this quickly - it is a good time for them to shine, and patch things up.
- Bruce
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar