The next release of OS X will debut next month (August 2006). It may be called Leopard, though it's obvious that there aren't many good cat names left and Apple is going to have to move to a different species soon or suffer the embarrassment of a "Tabby" release.
Personally, I've had enough of the names anyway.
Oh, nothing wrong with cutesy project names, of course. And if you can tie it into marketing, fine. What I'm objecting to is the assumption by tech writers that their readers know which is which.
For example, I was recently offered a choice of installing an application built for Panther or one for Tiger. I had a momentary brain freeze. Which is it that I have now? I know it's 10.4, but is that Tiger or Panther? These OSes come out pretty fast, and About This Mac only reminds me that we're at 10.4.7 - it has nothing to say about cats.
OK, it was Jaguar, then Panther, then Tiger.. or was it?
Trouble is, it's just going to get worse. Two years from now Leopard will be old news but some apps are still going to have different versions. And some people just are not going to upgrade. Are we supposed to remember these names forever?
Let's just stop. Since OS X itself doesn't report anything but version numbers, people offering version limited apps should just state the version and forget the names. Or if you must use the name, at least put the version with it in parentheses.
Then forgetful old folks like me might have a chance of picking the right one.
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Fri Jul 14 12:22:11 2006: Subject: I completely agree anonymous
I feel exactly the same with Ubuntu GNU/Linux release codenames ! Happy that someone wrote about this issue :-)
Federico
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar