I meant to look at Symantec Mac A/V back when they
announced it last year, but I got busy..
It was the recent Mac Defender malware that reminded me. That, and an email message from a friend who had infected their Facebook. My wife clicked on the link - oops!.
She suffered no harm -it just crashed, because it was a Windows exploit and we don't run no stinkin' Windows here..
Still, the Mac stuff is obviously on its way and it can only become more sophisticated over time. Yes, 99.99% of it will be unimportant unless you foolishly use your admin password, but any of us can be fooled. If nothing else will trip you up, some site you absolutely trust (CPAN, Ubuntu, whatever) might get exploited and a download COULD get you. Unlikely, sure, but..
So I downloaded the Sophos. It is free, right?
Is it really? Well, I didn't have to give them a credit card, but their Try Sophos for free page makes me think this won't be free forever.
My guess is that it will stay free until Symantec sees enough usage - and enough threats found - that they think Mac users will be willing to pay to keep the product working.
My expectation was that virus scanning would bog my system down. I was especially concerned about that on my older 32 bit MacBook Pro. However, even while running a full disk scan, the CPU usage was not bothersome:
As you can see, the load was low; usually under 6%. Without the disk scan (only running in background as an interceptor), cpu usage dropped to 0.5% or less.
It found malware. Not just on my wife's machine, but also on mine.
That surprised me, honestly. I expected that my wife would have it - she knew she shouldn't have clicked on that link and had done so rather accidentally; she just zee'd out for a moment. But she had several more and although she did have more than I did, I was surprised that I had any!
Surprised both because I am more careful and also because I have scanned this machine with other products in the past. That might mean that this kind of malwalware is becoming both sneakier and more common.
These were trojans, not viruses, and they were all Windows Java exploits, ineffective on Mac, so they never got to ask for privilege escalation.
2011-05-22 06:36:33 -0400 Threat: 'Troj/ByteVer-G' detected in /Users/apl/Library
That's a Windows trojan, apparently related to this Microsoft threat warning.
Will that sort of unimportant result cause Mac owners not to care? This post in an Apple discussion group might be typical. A person noticed Sophos identifying Troj/ByteVer-G in their Java cache folder and asked what they should do. The answer:
It could have come from some random web site and/or ad.
It could simply be an error on the part of Sophos.
The easiest way to get rid of the problem is get rid of Sophos.
If that represents common thinking, Sophos may have a long wait before they make any money from Mac owners.
Given the small investment in CPU time and that it cost me no cash, I'm willing to leave this running. I'll update this post if and when it catches something real.
If this page was useful to you, please help others find it:
More Articles by Anthony Lawrence
- Find me on Google+
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site:
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Publishing your articles here
Jump to Comments
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.