Controlling core files (Linux)
Core files get created when a program misbehaves due to
a bug, or a violation of the
cpu or memory protection mechanisms. The operating system kills the program and
creates the core file.
If you don't want core files at all, set "ulimit -c 0" in your startup files. That's the default on many systems; in /etc/profile you may find
ulimit -S -c 0 > /dev/null 2>&1
If you DO want core files, you need to reset that in your own .bash_profile:
ulimit -c 50000
would allow core files but limit them to 50,000 bytes.
You have more control of core files in /proc/sys/kernel/
For example, you can do eliminate the tagged on pid by
echo "0" > /proc/sys/kernel/core_uses_pid
Core files will then just be named "core". People do things like that so that
a user can choose to put a non-writable file named "core" in directories
where they don't want to generate core dumps. That could be a directory (mkdir core) or a file (touch core;chmod 000 core). I've seen it suggested that a symlink named core would redirect the dump to wherever it pointed, but I found that didn't work.
But perhaps more interesting is that you can do:
chmod 777 /tmp/corefiles
echo "/tmp/corefiles/core" > /proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern
All corefiles then get tossed to /tmp/corefiles (don't change core_uses_pid if you do this).
Test this with a simple script:
# script that dumps core
kill -s SIGSEGV $$
(Article continues after the break)
But wait, there's more (if your kernel is new enough). From "man proc":
This file (new in Linux 2.5) provides finer control over the
form of a core filename than the obsolete
/proc/sys/kernel/core_uses_pid file described below. The name
for a core file is controlled by defining a template in
/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern. The template can contain %
specifiers which are substituted by the following values when
a core file is created:
%% A single % character
%p PID of dumped process
%u real UID of dumped process
%g real GID of dumped process
%s number of signal causing dump
%t time of dump (secs since 0:00h, 1 Jan 1970)
%h hostname (same as the 'nodename'
returned by uname(2))
%e executable filename
A single % at the end of the template is dropped from the core
filename, as is the combination of a % followed by any character
other than those listed above. All other characters in the
template become a literal part of the core filename. The maximum
size of the resulting core filename is 64 bytes. The default
value in this file is "core". For backward compatibility, if
/proc/sys/kernel/core_pattern does not include "%p" and
/proc/sys/kernel/core_uses_pid is non-zero, then .PID will be
appended to the core filename.
If you are running a Linux kernel that doesn't support this, you'll get no core
files at all, which is also what happens if the directory in core_pattern doesn't exist or isn't writable by the user dumping core. So that's yet another way
to not dump core for certain users: set core_pattern to a directory that they can't write to, and give write permission to the users who you do want to create core files.
The "ulimit" can do much more: see Understanding ulimit
If this page was useful to you, please help others find it:
More Articles by Tony Lawrence
- Find me on Google+
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Jump to Comments
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
I am a Kerio reseller. Articles here related to Kerio products reflect my honest opinion, but I do have an obvious interest in selling those products also.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.