The news that Citrix is planning to give away their Xen server product has people talking. I think it's very interesting how this announcement was made:
The new free Citrix XenServer release will be available for download from the Citrix website and other download portals by the end of March 2009.
But.. the product page at Citrix says a free version IS available now..
Here's the interesting thing: Citrix Xenserver requires a 64 bit machine AND a Windows box to manage it. You can download the free open source Xen from The University of Cambridge and run it on 32 bit hardware and without a Windows client to manage it. So why should you care about Citrix Xenserver?
OK, Citrix probably has added stuff. Specifically, they've probably added hooks for their Citrix Essentials for XenServer, which is NOT a free product. If you need that, obviously you'd want the Citrix Xen rather than the open source version. They may also have made it easier for non-technical people to deploy - though I have to wonder why non-technical people would be dabbling in virtualization at all!
As a sub page specifically notes that "You can buy support", presumably that might be a reason to choose this over raw Xen.
Aside from the annoying requirement of a Windows management box, is there any other reason not to embrace this? I'd be worried about divergence and lock-in: will Citrix keep up with the Xen project or will they lag behind because of the need to keep their hooks in place? On the other hand, is it possible for Citrix Xen to leap ahead of the Xen project in features?
Assuming you don't need the "Essentials", would you ever consider a corporatized (I can't believe spell-check didn't flag THAT!) version of a product that is freely available as open source?
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Wed Mar 25 15:13:49 2009: Subject: anonymous
Classic clueless post.
I'm all for free,open-source etc but this time XenServer IS BETTER in many ways:
- you get a buinch of extra features for free including live relocation (XenMotion), storage options, pooling, central management client (XenCenter) etc
- you get FREE SUPPORT (yes, aside of their forums and emails they also have a phone number to call for FREE)
- it's market-proven, no need to "hack-your-stuff'' university-styled lazyboys love to do (try doing that in a competitive business environment where money and hours count and you get fired in weeks)
In other words it's rather an idiotic question why one WOULD NOT try XenServer instead of Xen.
Wed Mar 25 15:18:42 2009: Subject: anonymous
PS: "Assuming you don't need the "Essentials","
Nice BS there - so in other words you simply asking "if you FORGET all the FREE EXTRA FEATURES of XenServer then would you use it instead of using a Xen?"
Nobody loves Windows and posting a "Why I HATE Windows?" is pathetic enough already but this kind of utterly loser trick, stupid hypocrisy is downright lame, that is.
Wed Mar 25 15:21:55 2009: Subject: TonyLawrence
Ahh - I was wondering why all the anger..
Your second comment explains that. Thanks for your pleasantries.
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar