Bash HISTCONTROL

I happened to come across Linux Tips: take control of your bash_history. This explains that setting "export HISTCONTROL=ignoreboth" causes Bash not to store duplicate commands in history. For example, if you are checking "ps" waiting for some process to end:

ps -e | grep foo

and keep pressing up arrow every few seconds to repeat it, you'll end up with a long list of those in your history if this isn't set. If it is set, you get only the last.

Actually there's much more to this than that little post exlained.

First, there's actually several values HISTCONTROL can take. On newer bash, it can be set to "ignorespace", "ignoredups", "ignoreboth" or "erasedups". Bash 2.05 doesn't have "erasedups".

If you want manual control over history, set "ignorespace". Then remember to use a space to precede any command you don't want to remember in history. Bash ignores leading spaces, so "  ls" is as good as "ls", but with "ignorespace" set, "  ls" won't be saved.

The "ignoredups" setting ignores repeated lines. Typing "ls" twenty times in a row only ends up with one of them in history. However, typing "ls" and then "ps" and then "ls" again will store "ls" and "ps" every time - unless you have bash 3 and set "erasedups". If that's set, no duplicates get entered in bash history at all.

You can also control bash history with HISTIGNORE. For example, if I
"declare -x HISTIGNORE=ls:ps"
, neither "ls" or "ps" will appear in my history. To ignore all two character commands, use "declare -x HISTIGNORE='??'".

I don't like extra commands cluttering up my history file, so I use "ignoreboth". When available, I use "erasedups", but if you are using history as a record of commands rather than just for the convenience of repetition, you don't want that.

Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them.

I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.

Comments




Sun Jun 8 02:22:30 2008: Subject:   anonymous


I am hoping that the following is just for example's sake, but if not, type "man watch" to learn about your new best friend- in this case the simplest version is: watch "ps -e | grep foo"

"if you are checking "ps" waiting for some process to end:
ps -e | grep foo
and keep pressing up arrow every few seconds to repeat it,"




Sun Jun 8 10:39:41 2008: Subject:   TonyLawrence


Yes, it was just for example, but keep in mind that bash runs on lots of systems that do NOT have "watch". or anything like it.

Old Unix folk like me would be unlikely to use it anyway. Out of long habit, we'd write

while :
ps -e | grep foo
sleep 2
done

or whatever. So "watch" will never be our new best friend :-)





Mon Jun 9 01:18:00 2008: Subject:   BigDumbDinosaur
http://bcstechnology.net

Hey! Watch it with the "old UNIX folks" stuff. I resemble that remark!

Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email

Click here to add your comments

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar

Learn Mac OS X Command Line