Why use a VPN instead of opening ports?

Got questions? Go ahead: Ask me anything!

Anonymous asks:

I need to access my security cameras from home. My camera guys says we need to forward ports on the firewall, but my firewall guy says I should use the VPN instead. Who is right?

Well, there's nothing wrong with what the camera dude said: you can forward specific ports to internal IP addresses. Most firewalls allow that although they may refer to it in different ways. You might find it under "Gaming" on some firewalls, "Port Forwarding" on others, "DNAT (Destination NAT)", "Translation" - but whatever it's called, the concept is that the packets get sent to the specified internal machine. That's a very common way to gain access to internal devices like cameras.

But your security guy is right too. He's saying to use the VPN capability of the firewall. This adds security. An external port scan of the camera ports will find nothing responding - all access would have to be through the VPN, no camera ports are forwarded. As VPN's are also usually configured to allow access only for specific users, this gives you even more control of who can see your cameras. No ports need be opened to the world and you give access to only those you want to be able to see the cameras.

As you have VPN on your firewall, I'd agree with your security guy.



Got something to add? Send me email.





(OLDER) <- More Stuff -> (NEWER)    (NEWEST)   

Printer Friendly Version

-> -> Why use a VPN instead of opening ports?



Increase ad revenue 50-250% with Ezoic


More Articles by

Find me on Google+

© Anthony Lawrence



Kerio Connect Mailserver

Kerio Samepage

Kerio Control Firewall

Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more.

Contact us

privacy policy