If this isn't exactly what you wanted, please try our Search (there's a LOT of techy and non-techy stuff here about Linux, Unix, Mac OS X and just computers in general!):
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 18:44:50 -0400 From: Tony Lawrence <tony@aplawrence.com> Subject: Re: SCO 5.0.6 Question References: <m15rQ9A-0006plC@cactus.com> Jeff Hyman wrote: > Those are fightin' words in my part of the country. Apparently > JP did not have the same problem. Thats why I asked him to post his > 5 clicks. Either way Tony, you claim to not care, yet it appears that > this forum does in fact bring benefit to you with many solutions > being refocused to your website.
Benefit? Hardly. My web hosting costs me net after all income from advertising and donations appx $100.00 a month. I spend easily ten hours a week and often more updating links, posting new information, etc. Don't get me wrong- it's a labor of love, as is what little I contribute here, but the benefits are definitely not monetary. In fact, when I retire (which I hope is not too many years away), I'll be forced to shut it down because I just won't be able to afford to underwrite it. As to not caring about Caldera, that's just simple reality. If they fail, someone else will pick up what remains of SCO. My business will continue as usual. The product is caught between a rock and a hard place no matter who owns it, and that wouldn't change. BTW, I fully agree with Brian's sentiments in another part of this thread: SCO is a much easier and stable product to work with. I too am running Linux now as my personal machine, and in some ways it's better for that, but it's a bumpy ride at times. My old sco server was comfortably boring :-)
>I don't understand why you would > want to make a flamatory comment when in fact you are in a position > to help participate in the solution. I personally have not been > disapointed with much of what Caldera has been (or not been) doing. The only thing I'm disappointed with is this business of dropping SCO links. Someone suggested to me that it's possible that they did not buy the sco domain- if so, that's horrible, but understandable- but dammit, if that is the case, they should SAY SO, because they are looking like damn idiots now. > I feel they are probably doing the best they can with the resources > they have available, in a time where technology companies are all > refocusing and cutting back just to stay even. Your a good man > Tony, and believe me I'm not siding with any party here. What words > could I say, or what could I do, to help refocus your energy to > a more positive place? If they need resources to help redirect the SCO pages to appropriate Caldera pages, all they have to do is ask. I'd be very happy to volunteer my time to help with that- the fact is, it's not any big major project, it's dead simple for 99.995% of the cases. Of course, if they don't own the domain, that's a totally different story.. -- Tony Lawrence SCO/Linux Support Tips, How-To's, Tests and more:

/Bofcusm/893.html copyright 1997-2004 (various authors) All Rights Reserved
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar