CHAP

If this isn't exactly what you wanted, please try our Search (there's a LOT of techy and non-techy stuff here about Linux, Unix, Mac OS X and just computers in general!):

From - Mon Aug 23 19:29:28 1999
Xref: world comp.unix.sco.misc:103600
Path: world!newsfeed.mathworks.com!wn3feed!worldnet.att.net!wnmaster2!not-for-mail
From: Richard Seeder <aapex@worldnet.att.net>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sco.misc
Subject: Re: Need ISP for SCO OpenServer
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:59:21 -0500
Organization: AApex Information Systems
Lines: 37
Message-ID: <37C16FD9.6D0A0FCB@worldnet.att.net> 
References: <37BFF774.7D02A6D0@aplawrence.com> <19990822134241.26361.00002760@ng-fz1.aol.com> 
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.75.155.52
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: bgtnsc03.worldnet.att.net 935423919 11755 12.75.155.52 (23 Aug 1999 15:58:39 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldnet.att.net
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 Aug 1999 15:58:39 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
X-Mozilla-Status: 8011

Transpower wrote:
> 
> Thanks for the responses so far.
> I do have PPP setup (and did that years ago), but for the convenience of the
> staff of the client I would like to have the connection software be in
> X-Windows and look like AOL or CompuServe.  I don't really care what the ISP is
> running, although I agree that UNIX experience would be desirable.  I know that
> AT&T Worldnet doesn't work.  Heck, AOL doesn't have a native version of its
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This is incorrect.  We have connected through Worldnet all along (since
early 1997).  If you are using MSTPPP the chap authentication requires
you to use "*" as each Worldnet connection has its own name, but
otherwise it works just fine.

> software for Windows NT, let alone for OpenServer; we have to use its Windows
> 3.1 version for NT!  So, again I ask is there anybody out there with connection
> software for OpenServer which, after loading, looks and feels like AOL or
> Compuserve?
> 
> Regards,
> RWS
> transpower@aol.com

Just my two cents, here, as long as I'm at it.  Most ISP service rep's
eyes will glaze over (you can actually hear this over the phone) if you
mention that you are connecting from a Unix machine.  For a little more
money, using a router (Cisco, WebRamp, whatever) with all of the
connection protocols built-in will save you a considerable amount of
aggravation and time, while providing assorted, handy, additional
features.

--

Richard Seeder
aapex@worldnet.att.net

Take Control of Your Domain Names

Jump to Comments

Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.

Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.

We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.