samba vs. visionfs

If this isn't exactly what you wanted, please try our Search (there's a LOT of techy and non-techy stuff here about Linux, Unix, Mac OS X and just computers in general!):

From - Thu Oct 19 07:11:47 2000
Path: news.randori.com!newsfeeder.randori.com!codeine.org!grolier!dispose.news.demon.net!demon!news.demon.co.uk!demon!gallsubs.demon.co.uk!not-for-mail
From: "Rob Neil" <robn@galleon.co.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sco.misc
Subject: Re: VisionFS 3.10.905 Failure
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 10:04:44 +0100
Message-ID: <971946260.21491.0.nnrp-08.9e98f2f4@news.demon.co.uk> 
References: <4.3.2.7.2.20001009162327.00db3bd0@scogr1.cscc.maximus.com> <20001009145050.13617@tegan.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20001009162327.00db3bd0@scogr1.cscc.maximus.com> <4.3.2.7.2.20001009164816.00db2d00@scogr1.cscc.maximus.com> <8rtcge$21u$1@lerami.lerctr.org> <4.3.2.7.2.20001011105743.00c4ff00@scogr1.cscc.maximus.com> 
NNTP-Posting-Host: gallsubs.demon.co.uk
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: gallsubs.demon.co.uk:158.152.242.244
X-Trace: news.demon.co.uk 971946260 nnrp-08:21491 NO-IDENT gallsubs.demon.co.uk:158.152.242.244
X-Complaints-To: abuse@demon.net
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Lines: 54
Xref: news.randori.com comp.unix.sco.misc:67510
X-Mozilla-Status: 8011
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000

All I can say is that I got fed up with VisionFS hanging (1.2 and 3.0) and
so moved to Samba in a fit of pique one morning (on OSR5 and Solaris 2.5.1).
Both installations have been running happily for 9 months now and anecdotal
evidence would suggest that Samba is WAY faster.

Rob

--
----
Rob Neil                        Email: robn@galleon.co.uk
Systems Manager, Galleon Ltd    Tel:   (01795) 414549

"Ken Wolff" <kenw@cscc.maximus.com> wrote in message
news:4.3.2.7.2.20001011105743.00c4ff00@scogr1.cscc.maximus.com...
> At 10:01 AM 10/11/00 +0000, Brian K. White wrote:
>
> >I've not had 3.1 running long enough or used enough to tell yet, but I've
> >had mysterious "just kinda stopped working after a while" problems with
all
> >the 3.0 versions (only versions I ever used) enough such that I'm holding
> >off pitching it to my boss as a replacement for facetwin for our clients.
I
> >know how to configure plain old telnet well enough to replace the facet
term
> >emulator, but vsion has not been stable enough to replace the
file-sharing,
> >and I'never had time to play with samba except at home a little and then
> >only on linux.
> >
> >what say ye-whoever? what's the general consensus on samba-on-OSR5 as far
as
> >dependability?
> >anecdotal accounts welcome.
>
> Under the 3.0 versions we had problems where you would lose network or
> printer connections and also problems where the user would be told their
> password was invalid but if they kept entering the same password 2, 3
maybe
> 4 times it eventually took it.  Keeping in mind we've only been on 3.1 for
> a couple of weeks, we have not had those problems.  Only once did we run
> into port 139 being in use and that could have been due to some other
> errant program/user grabbing it and hosing off Vision.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> Ken Wolff
> Phone: 616-957-4949  Ext: 111
> FAX: 616-957-1614
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>

Take Control of Easy Backups in Leopard

Take Control of Fonts in Leopard

Jump to Comments

Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.

Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.

We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.