If this isn't exactly what you wanted, please try our Search (there's a LOT of techy and non-techy stuff here about Linux, Unix, Mac OS X and just computers in general!):
From - Mon Aug 27 11:11:46 2001 Path: typhoon.ne.mediaone.net!chnws06.ne.mediaone.net!24.147.2.43!chnws02.mediaone.net!newsfeed2.skycache.com!Cidera!dca6-feed2.news.digex.net!jfk3-feed1.news.digex.net!intermedia!news.maxwell.syr.edu!HSNX.atgi.net!sjc-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!iad-read.news.verio.net.POSTED!nosuchsite!bill Newsgroups: comp.unix.sco.misc From: bill@wjv.com (Bill Vermillion) Subject: Re: Can I use an Adaptec 1542CP in an SCO OpenServer 5.0.6 box? Reply-To: bv@wjv.com Organization: W.J.Vermillion - Orlando / Winter Park Message-ID: <GIq8Ep.1y79@wjv.com> References: <3B89D98C.DCF73C8A@home.com> Lines: 43 Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 12:37:37 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 157.238.210.131 X-Complaints-To: abuse@verio.net X-Trace: iad-read.news.verio.net 998920442 157.238.210.131 (Mon, 27 Aug 2001 13:54:02 GMT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 13:54:02 GMT Xref: chnws06.ne.mediaone.net comp.unix.sco.misc:102715 In article <3B89D98C.DCF73C8A@home.com>, Michael Sweeden <michaelsweeden@home.com> wrote: >I have a system that used to backup, then began to fail on occasion >when backing up, and now has progressed to the point of locking up >the entire system on occasion and usually failing. This lockup has >occurred both with Unix tar and with BackupEdge software. System >is an OpenServer 5.0.6 Enterprise box with an Exabyte 8mm DAT tape >unit with hardware compression attached to an onboard "alad160" >host adapter. The hard disk system is a RAID 0 on an Adaptec >3200S controller. The tape drive and media have been changed to >no avail. I wish to see if the onboard SCSI adapter has a problem >by disabling it and installing an ISA Adaptec 1542CP adapter I >have - can anybody tell me if 5.0.6 supports it, and if so, how to >configure 5.0.6 for it? Any ideas on this problem would also be >appreciated. The system is rock solid except when backing up.
Be aware of all the problems any of the 1542s can cause in today's faster systems.. CPs were more problematic than the CF's for example. Make sure the PNP is turned off. However - a 1542 device is an ISA bus device - and consquently transfers to/from that device will go at the speed of the ISA bus - typicall 6-10MHz based on your motherboard. Far less than a 33MHz 4-byte wide PCI bus for example. Your Exabyte will accept data at a far higher rate than that which the 1542 can supply. So using the 1542 the tape drive will probably write to tape, stop, backup, wait, write, stop, backup, wait, and so on, as it writes faster than the data rate coming to it. This could backups to the Exabyte slower than using a tape drive that is more evenly matched to the 1542 that could stream, and old QIC for example. Exactly what 'fails' on backing up. It fails to backup? It fails to verify? The system fails? More detail on 'fail' would help just a bit. I think you'd be far better off getting something like a 6 2940 PCI used SCSI controller than something that dates back 5 to 6 years before that. -- Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com From - Mon Aug 27 11:12:00 2001 Path: typhoon.ne.mediaone.net!chnws06.ne.mediaone.net!24.147.2.43!chnws02.mediaone.net!newsfeed2.skycache.com!Cidera!dca6-feed2.news.digex.net!lax2-feed1.news.digex.net!intermedia!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!newshub2.rdc1.sfba.home.com!news.home.com!cyclone-sjo1.usenetserver.com!usenetserver.com!border1.nntp.aus1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!nntp3.aus1.giganews.com!bin3.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com.POSTED!robertl From: robertl@localhost.localdomain (Robert Lipe) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sco.misc Subject: Re: Can I use an Adaptec 1542CP in an SCO OpenServer 5.0.6 box? References: <3B89D98C.DCF73C8A@home.com> <GIq8Ep.1y79@wjv.com> Message-Id: <slrn9oko8s.8v6.robertl@localhost.localdomain> User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.4 (Linux) Lines: 22 NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 09:57:39 CDT Organization: Giganews.Com - Premium News Outsourcing X-Trace: sv3-KfoGiIvQjRV/OAcDun3c4Z3Rci2m4786uG90F/Lrny2ai0tGRWvXFazV71vbBqJH0qgHJuQSgo//0pO!ti25iVgH2WSWk/EpxVnsdyvb5KrkO21IILAcogZsoRrSrTYoW5aQU8qzBlAVY/e2e5M5puvhCSvh!F5So8Qg+hw== X-Complaints-To: abuse@GigaNews.Com X-DMCA-Notifications: http://www.giganews.com/info/dmca.html X-Abuse-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 14:57:39 GMT Xref: chnws06.ne.mediaone.net comp.unix.sco.misc:102718
On Mon, 27 Aug 2001 12:37:37 GMT, Bill Vermillion <bill@wjv.com> wrote: >However - a 1542 device is an ISA bus device - and consquently >transfers to/from that device will go at the speed of the ISA bus - As an additional form of horror, remember that ISA only has 24 address lines. This means its DMA can address memory only in the bottom 16Mb. So if you have a destination or source that's above that, it actually DMAs to a bounce buffer in that bottom 16Mb and then copies to the "real" address. (The order is reversed for outgoing data, of course.) This requires additional memory and a copy of all data on any sensible machine. This may or may not be a concern for you, but you should be aware that this combination will pretty much slap the host silly while doing this. >bit. I think you'd be far better off getting something like a 6 2940 >PCI used SCSI controller than something that dates back 5 to 6 years >before that. Yep.

/Bofcusm/36.html copyright 1997-2004 (various authors) All Rights Reserved
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar