If this isn't exactly what you wanted, please try our Search (there's a LOT of techy and non-techy stuff here about Linux, Unix, Mac OS X and just computers in general!):
From - Fri Mar 10 10:48:14 2000
Path: news.randori.com!korova.insync.net!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!newsfeed.cwix.com!news.compuserve.com!news-master.compuserve.com!not-for-mail
From: Bob Bailin <72027.3605@CompuServe.COM>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sco.misc
Subject: Re: *** HELP! HTFS Filesystem Crashed. ***
Date: 10 Mar 2000 15:13:09 GMT
Organization: .
Lines: 51
Message-ID: <8ab3e5$jod$1@ssauraac-i-1.production.compuserve.com>
References: <38C8B513.3A38094F@mipk-kspu.kharkov.ua>
NNTP-Posting-Host: mhako.production.compuserve.com
X-Trace: ssauraac-i-1.production.compuserve.com 952701189 20237 149.174.242.227 (10 Mar 2000 15:13:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@compuserve.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: 10 Mar 2000 15:13:09 GMT
Xref: news.randori.com comp.unix.sco.misc:56201
X-Mozilla-Status: 8011
X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000
"Artyom V. Viklenko" <artem@mipk-kspu.kharkov.ua> writes:
> Hi, Guys!
>
> I need help immediately!
>
> After moving hard drive from one SCO box to another and manualy
> making entries in /dev I lost access to filesystems on that drive.
>
> Fdisk sees correct partition table and divvy can show division table,
> but all divisions are 'NON FS' with correct per-block layout.
>
> fsck can't recognize fs type. If I use '-F HTFS' I got
> error about bad MAGIC NUMBER.
>
> Unfortunately I have no backup and data very important.
> At least to files from one filesystem ( compressed cpio archives
> of two filesystems at this drive ).
>
> Does anybody have clue? Is it possible using fsdb correct this magic
> number?
> At which offset?
>
> I make raw copy ( dd ) of divisions so I can experiment with drive.
>
> Any suggestions are welcome.
>
I would guess that the SCSI adapter on the new system is applying a different
drive translation (number of heads/cylinders/sectors) to the hard disk than
the old SCSI adapter. This would allow Unix to see the fdisk table
correctly, and possibly the divvy table too, but the actual data in the
divisions would be in the wrong order to make any sense as a valid
filesystem.
Are you going from a non-Adaptec adapter to an Adaptec on the new system?
> Thanks at all!
>
> --
> Sincerely yours,
> Artyom V. Viklenko.
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Artyom V. Viklenko : MIPK-KSPU 21, Frunze Str. Kharkov Ukraine 61002
> System Administrator : Phone: +38 0572 400026 Fax: +38 0572 474062
> artem@mipk-kspu.kharkov.ua http://www.freenet.kharkov.ua/~artem

--
Bob Bailin
72027.3605@compuserve.com
Enter your email address for automatic notification of new posts here
(be sure to whitelist 'feedburner.com' if you use spam filtering)
| Views for this page | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | This Week | This Month | This Year | Overall |
| 2 | 2 | 10 | 393 | 2,026 |
/Bofcusm/309.html copyright 1997-2004 (various authors) All Rights Reserved
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Add your comments