Best of the Newsgroups: ipu vs. fresh install

If this isn't exactly what you wanted, please try our Search (there's a LOT of techy and non-techy stuff here about Linux, Unix, Mac OS X and just computers in general!):

Maybe what I want IS there..

From: Bela Lubkin <belal@sco.com>
Subject: Re: IPU's vs. Fresh Installs
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 22:12:22 GMT
References: <bh5qrl$jen$1@pcls4.std.com> 

tony@aplawrence.com wrote:

> We've had a fair amount of discussion of this recently, but it has been
> mushed into to a partially unrelated thread, so I think it might help
> to make a fresh start.
> 
> First, let's correct a misunderstanding that Bela had:
> 
> The majority of my work is NOT with clients I've had a long term
> relationship with.  I'm much more apt to be working on systems I have
> never seen in my life, systems whose provenance is unknown to me and
> perhaps even to the owners.
> 
> In fact, if I am the person who originally installed and has since
> administered a system, I am actually much more favored toward an IPU,
> because in that case I know what modifications and configuration changes
> have been made.
> 
> It's interesting that this seems to be quite contrary to what Bela
> suggested (that it's easier to do IPU's on unfamiliar systems).

I'm not saying either is generally "easier", I'm saying that in some
cases an IPU will preserve some important detail(s) you would otherwise
have a hard time finding.

> Another misconception is that my concern is with catastrophic failures.
> Actually, that's not the case at all: those are rather unimportant.
> It's the nasty little glitches, the unexpected inconsistencies that come
> from preserving  the wrong stuff that concerns me.  Those problems are
> much more difficult to root out, and in fact may not exhibit immediately.

So we're concerned about the same thing.  You worry that subtleties may
be carried along to a system's detriment.  I worry that subtleties may
be lost, to a system's detriment.

> At http://aplawrence.com/Unixart/ipuvsfreshinstall.html , I've posted my
> reasons for preferring fresh installs, and suggested that I would like
> IPU's a lot better if they would produce a full directory hierarchy diff
> of the upgraded system vs.  the pre-upgrade system (or against what a
> fresh install would have produced), and a diff of all files preserved
> or merged against the fresh versions that otherwise would have been
> installed.
> 
> It seems to me that would be a pretty simple thing to add to the IPU code,
> and it would have tremendous benefits.  It would be easy to fix any mods
> that should not have been applied, easy to spot crapola that you don't
> need or want anymore, and in fact easy to "roll back" to as close to
> "fresh" as you needed to go to get it right.
> 
> Until that happens though, I'll do fresh installs because I then can
> generate my own diffs and from that decide what to copy, merge, hand
> configure or ignore.

What you're asking for is already available to you.  You do an IPU,
restore the old system into a subdirectory, and compare.  You can also
compare to "original" versions relative to the new release, by following
paths like /opt/K/SCO/Unix/*/.softmgmt/var/etc/default/login.  For any
"var" file in the SSO,

  /var/opt/K/SCO/[product]/[version]/rest-of-link

the original unmodified version (belonging to the current version of
that SSO) is:

  /opt/K/SCO/[product]/[version]/.softmgmt/var/rest-of-link

i.e. remove the leading "/var", add "/.softmgmt/var" after the version.

>Bela<

Take Control of Your Domain Names

Jump to Comments

Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.

Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.

We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.