If this isn't exactly what you wanted, please try our Search (there's a LOT of techy and non-techy stuff here about Linux, Unix, Mac OS X and just computers in general!):
From - Sat Mar 6 05:22:48 1999 Xref: world comp.unix.sco.misc:91280 Path: world!newsfeed.mathworks.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!204.238.120.130!news-feeds.jump.net!nntp2.dejanews.com!nnrp1.dejanews.com!not-for-mail From: Rob Hamilton <robz@my-dejanews.com> Newsgroups: comp.unix.sco.misc Subject: Re: ^C during telnet from Win95 broken Date: Fri, 05 Mar 1999 17:21:44 GMT Organization: Deja News - The Leader in Internet Discussion Lines: 69 Message-ID: <7bp3qs$vrr$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> References: <36d6e178.1816230581@news> <36D885D6.5E74111F@dca.net> <36DFACB5.A7B08A54@zutritt.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: 194.42.250.68 X-Article-Creation-Date: Fri Mar 05 17:21:44 1999 GMT X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 4.01; Windows 95; DIL0001004) X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x6.dejanews.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 194.42.250.68 X-Mozilla-Status: 8011 Hi, The windows telnet app is maybe not the best thing to use. I dont use it myself, but I had a quick look... and funny things are happening. It's not a terminal emulation thing, but a telnet protocol compatibility thing.
Now, instead of the prompt returing after hitting break or ctrl-c (whatever your interrupt character is) you may see a single "funny looking" character instead? This turns out to be 242 (telnetd DM code) which is usually sent by SCO 5.4 telnetd in the sequence 255/242 (IAC-DM) on a keyboard interrupt. My guess was that windows telnet wasnt processing this as expected. So I tried running "script t" on SCO. This turns off the IAC-DM send Guess what... windows telnet now behaved properly. (btw that *isnt* a fix! script will create a huge log file you probably dont want!) Also telneting to an old box (SCO 3.2 which doesnt send IAC.DM) was ok too. er... At this I gave up. Getting another telnet for windows is probably the simplest thing to do. (its pretty slow and awful anyway). If you absolutely must use it you could try replacing the SCO telnetd with an older version which might be compatible, but I wouldnt recommend that. regards, Rob In article <36DFACB5.A7B08A54@zutritt.at>, Nikolaus Volejnik <holzinger.zeit@zutritt.at> wrote: > I think that this is a problem of all windows machines (NT, 98, 95) because > the > the windows-telnet isn�t as well as teerminal emulations like TUN Emul. We > are using > TUN Emul for years and never had any problems with escape-sequences like ^C > or > others. Maybe this will help. > > nik > > lenlutz wrote: > > > Thats sometime DELETE > > > > Michael Ryan wrote: > > > > > > Hi people, > > > > > > When I telnet to a SCO OSR504 system from Win95 and hit ^C for > > > the interrupt key, it doesn't work correctly. I need to send another > > > character before processing of the ^C occurs. My stty settings > > > are fine. Any ideas? Any fixes? TIA. > > > > > > Mike > > > <mike@NetworX.ie> > > > --- > > > > -- > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > Most of what I have learned has been taught to me by others. > > I guess that means I have to teach others what I have learned > > =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= > > -----------== Posted via Deja News, The Discussion Network ==---------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Discuss, or Start Your Own

/Bofcusm/15.html copyright 1997-2004 (various authors) All Rights Reserved
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar