Sat Jul 3 21:51:47 2004 "No programming"
Posted by Tony Lawrence
Search Keys: programming scripting mac tiger automator
Referencing: http://www.apple.com/macosx/tiger/automator.html
I've been looking over the descriptions of Apple's next Tiger OS. There's a lot of interesting features promised, but the one that brought a smile to my face was this "Automator", which will let you create little apps for repetitive tasks and "you don�t have to write any code".
Except of course you do.
Whether you are typing words or selecting "Actions" from pull-down menus, you are still writing code. I can't tell from the descriptions provided whether this is just sequential tasks or it has some "if-then" capability, but it doesn't matter: you are writing code. If you write dumb code (like deleting something before you copy it somewhere else), you'll get dumb results. If it does have any test and branch capability, no matter how limited, you will have to be thinking about the same kinds of things "real programmers" think about.
All silly tools like this offer is a protective cocoon that insulates you from typing words. It doesn't make your brain unnecessary, and it won't prevent stupidity any more than any compiler/interpreter does already. In fact, when things go wrong, this type of programming is even more confusing and less helpful than those awful "languages" that involve typing horrible words into a file!
I hope that this thing generates text files that people can look at. Perhaps some of them will reach the obvious conclusion that it would be a lot quicker and easier just to create the text to start with, and will move from that to some language like Perl or Python.

Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
"If you write dumb code (like deleting something before you copy it somewhere else), you'll get dumb results."
Reminds of a guy years ago who was real proud of his ability to write short BASIC programs (big deal, seems anyone can do that). He derided me for writing in machine code, telling me it wasn't a real programming language and that it wasn't good for much of anything -- only a true propeller head would think otherwise.
My reply (as I twirled the ole Hartzell real fast) was that machine code may not be a real language but it sure could run all that useless code real fast.
--BigDumbDinosaur
"If you write dumb code (like deleting something before you copy it somewhere else), you'll get dumb results."
Reminds of a guy years ago who was real proud of his ability to write short BASIC programs (big deal, seems anyone can do that). He derided me for writing in machine code, telling me it wasn't a real programming language and that it wasn't good for much of anything -- only a true propeller head would think otherwise.
My reply (as I twirled the ole Hartzell real fast) was that machine code may not be a real language but it sure could run all that useless code real fast.
--BigDumbDinosaur
"If you write dumb code (like deleting something before you copy it somewhere else), you'll get dumb results."
Reminds of a guy years ago who was real proud of his ability to write short BASIC programs (big deal, seems anyone can do that). He derided me for writing in machine code, telling me it wasn't a real programming language and that it wasn't good for much of anything -- only a true propeller head would think otherwise.
My reply (as I twirled the ole Hartzell real fast) was that machine code may not be a real language but it sure could run all that useless code real fast.
--BigDumbDinosaur
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar