Wed Jun 30 16:00:51 2004 Slashdot subscriptions???
Posted by Tony Lawrence
Search Keys: slashdot micropayments paid surfing
Referencing: http://slashdot.org/faq/subscriptions.shtml
Whoaa, Nellie: do they really think this will work?
OK, yeah, Slashdot is often interesting, and $5.00 for 1,000 pages isn't exactly outrageous, but then again, do I really care that this lets me see articles 20 minutes earlier than non-subscribers?
Well, no, I don't. Apparently this has been in place for a while, and the first time I ever noticed it (because it refused to show me an article) was today. Obviously immediacy isn't normally an issue for me, and I suspect it isn't for too many others, either.
So how about you? Have you been refused a Slashdot article yet? Do you read Slashdot religiously, regularly, sometimes? Would you cough up $5.00 for this "early reader" privilege?

Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Many of the products and books I review are things I purchased for my own use. Some were given to me specifically for the purpose of reviewing them. I resell or can earn commissions from the sale of some of these items. Links within these pages may be affiliate links that pay me for referring you to them. That's mostly insignificant amounts of money; whenever it is not I have made my relationship plain. I also may own stock in companies mentioned here. If you have any question, please do feel free to contact me.
Specific links that take you to pages that allow you to purchase the item I reviewed are very likely to pay me a commission. Many of the books I review were given to me by the publishers specifically for the purpose of writing a review. These gifts and referral fees do not affect my opinions; I often give bad reviews anyway.
We use Google third-party advertising companies to serve ads when you visit our website. These companies may use information (not including your name, address, email address, or telephone number) about your visits to this and other websites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services of interest to you. If you would like more information about this practice and to know your choices about not having this information used by these companies, click here.
Click here to add your comments
"Do you read Slashdot religiously, regularly, sometimes?"
I hardly read Slashdot at all. I don't like the snotty, sophomoric attitude that pervades that site.
--BigDumbDinosaur
"Do you read Slashdot religiously, regularly, sometimes?"
I hardly read Slashdot at all. I don't like the snotty, sophomoric attitude that pervades that site.
--BigDumbDinosaur
But don't you think that's always going to happen with popular sites? Certainly many Slashdot posters are articulate and intelligent, it's just that their voice is lost in the noise of the jerks. The modding system contributes because the intelligent folks are of course in a minority, so the dumb comments get modded up.
But ignoring the comments, I still find Slashdot informative - maybe less so today than it used to be, but I still take a quick peek almost every day. And I do look at the comments when I want a sense of general opinion on something - I read a lot of the comments about Gmail, for example.
But it's not something I'd pay for - at least not while there are still easy and free ways to find the same info.
--TonyLawrence
"Do you read Slashdot religiously, regularly, sometimes?"
I hardly read Slashdot at all. I don't like the snotty, sophomoric attitude that pervades that site.
--BigDumbDinosaur
But don't you think that's always going to happen with popular sites? Certainly many Slashdot posters are articulate and intelligent, it's just that their voice is lost in the noise of the jerks. The modding system contributes because the intelligent folks are of course in a minority, so the dumb comments get modded up.
But ignoring the comments, I still find Slashdot informative - maybe less so today than it used to be, but I still take a quick peek almost every day. And I do look at the comments when I want a sense of general opinion on something - I read a lot of the comments about Gmail, for example.
But it's not something I'd pay for - at least not while there are still easy and free ways to find the same info.
--TonyLawrence
"Certainly many Slashdot posters are articulate and intelligent, it's just that their voice is lost in the noise of the jerks."
Well, I seem to have little patience for that sort of thing. Since most, if not all, of the information available from Slashdot can be obtained from other less annoying sources I really don't feel compelled to wade through a lot of mud just to catch one little fish. I certainly wouldn't pay for anything at Slashdot.
--BigDumbDinosaur
"Do you read Slashdot religiously, regularly, sometimes?"
I hardly read Slashdot at all. I don't like the snotty, sophomoric attitude that pervades that site.
--BigDumbDinosaur
But don't you think that's always going to happen with popular sites? Certainly many Slashdot posters are articulate and intelligent, it's just that their voice is lost in the noise of the jerks. The modding system contributes because the intelligent folks are of course in a minority, so the dumb comments get modded up.
But ignoring the comments, I still find Slashdot informative - maybe less so today than it used to be, but I still take a quick peek almost every day. And I do look at the comments when I want a sense of general opinion on something - I read a lot of the comments about Gmail, for example.
But it's not something I'd pay for - at least not while there are still easy and free ways to find the same info.
--TonyLawrence
"Certainly many Slashdot posters are articulate and intelligent, it's just that their voice is lost in the noise of the jerks."
Well, I seem to have little patience for that sort of thing. Since most, if not all, of the information available from Slashdot can be obtained from other less annoying sources I really don't feel compelled to wade through a lot of mud just to catch one little fish. I certainly wouldn't pay for anything at Slashdot.
--BigDumbDinosaur
Don't miss responses! Subscribe to Comments by RSS or by Email
Click here to add your comments
If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a Gravatar