Slashdot subscriptions???

Wed Jun 30 16:00:51 2004 Slashdot subscriptions???

Posted by Tony Lawrence
Search Keys: slashdot micropayments paid surfing
Referencing: http://slashdot.org/faq/subscriptions.shtml


Hate these ads?

Whoaa, Nellie: do they really think this will work?

OK, yeah, Slashdot is often interesting, and $5.00 for 1,000 pages isn't exactly outrageous, but then again, do I really care that this lets me see articles 20 minutes earlier than non-subscribers?

Well, no, I don't. Apparently this has been in place for a while, and the first time I ever noticed it (because it refused to show me an article) was today. Obviously immediacy isn't normally an issue for me, and I suspect it isn't for too many others, either.

So how about you? Have you been refused a Slashdot article yet? Do you read Slashdot religiously, regularly, sometimes? Would you cough up $5.00 for this "early reader" privilege?



Comments
CommentsBlog958 :

"Do you read Slashdot religiously, regularly, sometimes?"

I hardly read Slashdot at all. I don't like the snotty, sophomoric attitude that pervades that site.

--BigDumbDinosaur

But don't you think that's always going to happen with popular sites? Certainly many Slashdot posters are articulate and intelligent, it's just that their voice is lost in the noise of the jerks. The modding system contributes because the intelligent folks are of course in a minority, so the dumb comments get modded up.

But ignoring the comments, I still find Slashdot informative - maybe less so today than it used to be, but I still take a quick peek almost every day. And I do look at the comments when I want a sense of general opinion on something - I read a lot of the comments about Gmail, for example.

But it's not something I'd pay for - at least not while there are still easy and free ways to find the same info.

--TonyLawrence

"Certainly many Slashdot posters are articulate and intelligent, it's just that their voice is lost in the noise of the jerks."

Well, I seem to have little patience for that sort of thing. Since most, if not all, of the information available from Slashdot can be obtained from other less annoying sources I really don't feel compelled to wade through a lot of mud just to catch one little fish. I certainly wouldn't pay for anything at Slashdot.

--BigDumbDinosaur

Add your comments

Enter your email address for automatic notification of new posts here
(be sure to whitelist 'feedburner.com' if you use spam filtering)

Or use any RSS reader

Delivered by FeedBurner


Views for this page
Today This Week This Month This Year  Overall
31121312 2,173

Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.

Publishing your articles here

pavatar.jpg
More:
       - Opinion
       - Blog




Unix/Linux Consultants

Your ad here - $48.00 yearly!

http://bcstechnology.net Full service Linux & UNIX systems integrator; Windows to UNIX/Linux Client-Server Specialist; Secure E-Mail & Website Hosting; Thoroughbred Software Developer; Custom Industrial Automation; Hardware & Electronics Experts; In Business Since 1985.


http://www.breakthru.com.au SCO (Openserver and Unixware), Unix, Solaris and Linux Consulting services including: Secure Networking Solutions; Linux based Firewalls; Backup Solutions; Secure Home to Office Network Setup; Phone, Remote and On-Site Support available - Satisfaction Guaranteed!


larryi@ccamedical.com SCO OS5, Debian Linux, RedHat Linux, MySQL, Apache, AJAX development using dXport/dL4/Unibasic, Windows Connectivity, Sharing Resouces, Automation, Shell Scripting



Twitter
  • Nov 21 07:55
    @loudmouthman: correct, but how do you prove ANYTHING like that is accurate? You can't. A text file is no better or worse than anything.
  • Nov 21 07:40
    @loudmouthman: well, a digital signature could prove it hadn't been altered. Text is no more insecure than anything else in that sense.









Change Congress


Related Posts


Publish your articles, comments, book reviews or opinions here!