04/02/2004 05:48 PM Re: [jpr@jpr.com: Re: Simple stupid shell script] Samba vs. visionfs

04/02/2004 05:48 PM Re: [jpr@jpr.com: Re: Simple stupid shell script] Samba vs. visionfs

Newsgroup post saved:

Re: [jpr@jpr.com: Re: Simple stupid shell script] Samba vs. visionfs



Hate these ads?




M3IP inc.

Enter your email address for automatic notification of new posts here
(be sure to whitelist 'feedburner.com' if you use spam filtering)

Or use any RSS reader

Delivered by FeedBurner


Views for this page
Today This Week This Month This Year  Overall
2511152 650

Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.

Publishing your articles here

pavatar.jpg
More:




Unix/Linux Consultants

Your ad here - $48.00 yearly!

http://thatitguy.com Business networking servers, Linux and Unix experts. In business since 1997! Windows and Exchange to Samba and Scalix migration experts.


http://www.schewanick.com SCO Unix, Solaris, Linx (various), PHP, MySQL, Apache, uniBasic, dL4, Perl, System Administration and more....


http://echo3.net/ Unix/Linux Custom Applications, Web Hosting, C/C++ Programming Courses



Twitter
  • Nov 21 07:55
    @loudmouthman: correct, but how do you prove ANYTHING like that is accurate? You can't. A text file is no better or worse than anything.
  • Nov 21 07:40
    @loudmouthman: well, a digital signature could prove it hadn't been altered. Text is no more insecure than anything else in that sense.









Change Congress


Related Posts


Publish your articles, comments, book reviews or opinions here!