11/23/2003 10:38 AM Re: Trying to automate installation of OSS601a on 5.0.2/4 automating sco's cutom patch install

11/23/2003 10:38 AM Re: Trying to automate installation of OSS601a on 5.0.2/4 automating sco's cutom patch install

Newsgroup post saved:

Re: Trying to automate installation of OSS601a on 5.0.2/4 automating sco's cutom patch install



Hate these ads?




LOD Communications, Inc.

Enter your email address for automatic notification of new posts here
(be sure to whitelist 'feedburner.com' if you use spam filtering)

Or use any RSS reader

Delivered by FeedBurner


ad

Views for this page
Today This Week This Month This Year  Overall
139140 591

Have you tried Searching this site?

Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates

This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.

Publishing your articles here

pavatar.jpg
More:




Unix/Linux Consultants

Your ad here - $48.00 yearly!

http://www.breakthru.com.au SCO (Openserver and Unixware), Unix, Solaris and Linux Consulting services including: Secure Networking Solutions; Linux based Firewalls; Backup Solutions; Secure Home to Office Network Setup; Phone, Remote and On-Site Support available - Satisfaction Guaranteed!


http://www.vss3.com SCO/Caldera OpenServer, Unixware & Linux. Tarantella & Non-stop Clustering


http://echo3.net/ Unix/Linux Custom Applications, Web Hosting, C/C++ Programming Courses



Twitter
  • Nov 21 07:55
    @loudmouthman: correct, but how do you prove ANYTHING like that is accurate? You can't. A text file is no better or worse than anything.
  • Nov 21 07:40
    @loudmouthman: well, a digital signature could prove it hadn't been altered. Text is no more insecure than anything else in that sense.









Change Congress


Related Posts


Publish your articles, comments, book reviews or opinions here!