Get APLawrence.com by RSS11/23/2003 10:38 AM Re: Trying to automate installation of OSS601a on 5.0.2/4 automating sco's cutom patch install
11/23/2003 10:38 AM Re: Trying to automate installation of OSS601a on 5.0.2/4 automating sco's cutom patch install
Newsgroup post saved:
Re: Trying to automate installation of OSS601a on 5.0.2/4
automating sco's cutom patch install
Enter your email address for automatic notification of new posts here
(be sure to whitelist 'feedburner.com' if you use spam filtering)
| Views for this page | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Today | This Week | This Month | This Year | Overall |
| 1 | 3 | 9 | 140 | 591 |
Have you tried Searching this site?
Unix/Linux/Mac OS X support by phone, email or on-site: Support Rates
This is a Unix/Linux resource website. It contains technical articles about Unix, Linux and general computing related subjects, opinion, news, help files, how-to's, tutorials and more. We appreciate comments and article submissions.
Your ad here - $48.00 yearly!
http://www.breakthru.com.au SCO (Openserver and Unixware), Unix, Solaris and Linux Consulting services including: Secure Networking Solutions; Linux based Firewalls; Backup Solutions; Secure Home to Office Network Setup; Phone, Remote and On-Site Support available - Satisfaction Guaranteed!
http://www.vss3.com SCO/Caldera OpenServer, Unixware & Linux. Tarantella & Non-stop Clustering
http://echo3.net/ Unix/Linux Custom Applications, Web Hosting, C/C++ Programming Courses
- Nov 21 07:55
@loudmouthman: correct, but how do you prove ANYTHING like that is accurate? You can't. A text file is no better or worse than anything. - Nov 21 07:40
@loudmouthman: well, a digital signature could prove it hadn't been altered. Text is no more insecure than anything else in that sense.
Related Posts
Publish your articles, comments, book reviews or opinions here!
Add your comments